New York City Budget Keeps Taxes the Same But Cuts 2,000 Employees

The City of New York, like so many other cities and small towns throughout the nation are in a severe cash shortage. The solution always comes down to cutting jobs or raising taxes, sometimes it is both.

Mayor Bloomberg and the city council tonight agreed on the new budget which goes into effect on July 1st. The budget calls fro the elimination of at least 2,000 employees.

(the) $63 billion budget that would slash at least 2,000 jobs but increase no taxes.

The deal would mean painful cuts in a variety of city services, including the elimination of some senior centers and day care programs, and less money for education and adult literacy programs. But over all, spending would increase by $3.6 billion, or about 6 percent, compared with the budget approved a year ago, because of rising pension and health care costs.

The city would achieve the cuts to the work force largely through attrition, though there would be about 1,000 layoffs, officials said. The Council is expected to meet next week to formally approve the budget, which would go into effect July 1. {…}

{…} Under the budget deal, the city’s police force, originally expected to lose nearly 900 officers, would be spared any cuts. And the beleaguered Health and Hospitals Corporation, which is facing a $1 billion deficit, would receive $350 million to ease its debt and avoid closing treatment centers and specialty outpatient care at many hospitals. (Source: New York times)

This is just an example of what is happening all across the nation as each city and town face the consequences of not having enough cash. Expect more of these kinds of reports in the months ahead.




More on this topic (What's this?)
Debunking Bush Tax Cut Myths
Basics of a Budget
Read more on Budget, Taxes at Wikinvest

Budget – What Budget?

House Democrats will not pass a budget blueprint in 2010, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) will confirm in a speech on Tuesday  (The Hill).

And the Republicans have come back swinging hard…

From GOP Leader John Boehner (R) (Source: Gop Leader)

Budget Has Been Cancelled




Robert Reich – A Keynesian Love Affair

Robert Reich, professor at the University of California at Berkeley and former labor secretary under President Bill Clinton has gone completely mad.

Mr. Reich wrote on his blog Friday that he thinks more Keynesian economic policy actions are needed to rescue the economy.

{…} For three decades, starting in the late 1970s, the biggest economic problem America faced on an ongoing basis was inflation. Demand always seemed to be on the verge of outrunning the productive capacity of the nation. The Fed had to be ready to raise interest rates to stop the party, as it did on several occasions.

During this era of inflation economics, it appeared that John Maynard Keynes – and his Depression-era concern about chronically inadequate demand — was dead. So-called “supply siders” told policy makers that if they cut taxes on corporations and the wealthy, they’d unleash a torrent of investment and innovation – thereby increasing the productive capacity of the nation. The benefits would trickle down to everyone else.

But the pendulum may now be swinging back to the earlier era in which demand always seems on the verge of trailing the nation’s productive capacity. The biggest ongoing threats are chronic recession or even deflation, because consumers don’t have enough money to what the economy is capable of selling at full or near-full employment. Despite gains in productivity, little has trickled down to America’s middle class. {…}

{…} Keynes prescribed two remedies – both of which are now necessary: Government spending to “prime the pump” and get businesses to invest and hire once again. And, as Keynes wrote, “measures for the redistribution of incomes in a way likely to raise the propensity to consume.” Translated: Instead of big tax cuts for corporations and the rich, tax cuts and income supplements for the middle class. (Source: Robert Reich Blog)

For those unfamiliar with Keynesian economics it is at its core a principal of big government spending in order to make up for inefficiencies in the private sector. In other words, spend lots of money to goose the economy. The name Keynesian comes from the British economist John Maynard Keynes.

The problem with the Keynesian concept is that it only makes the macro conditions worse by creating an economy that is dependent on government stimulus to stay afloat, while at the same time creates massive deficits that become unmanageable such as what we have now.

It has been said countless times, especially during presidential campaigns, that the nation will pass down its debt to our children and grandchildren. This is no longer true, it is the current generation that is burdened with the debt of the nation.  Mr. Reich advocates more government spending to ‘prime the pump’ as he calls it. But Mr. Reich, the pump is clogged with debt and only adding more debt will eventually kill the machine entirely when the United States goes so far into debt that it jeopardizes the credit worthiness of the nation.

More government spending in hopes it can buy its way out of poverty is foolish and dangerous. I contend that policy decisions over the past few decades were all forms of Keynesian economic theory. The relaxation of leverage rules allowing for banks and other financial institutions, the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act, the drive to make home ownership available to anyone by looking the other way when mortgage fraud was running rampant. These few examples are all part of a Keynesian mindset, which is to make money easier to get… to keep the pump primed, again using your words.

But where did that get us Mr. Reich? the ‘pump’ got so jammed up with debt that it seized up  and the economy came to a screeching halt. The solution can not be more of the same policies that led to the disaster. The solution is to remove the debt that which is clogging the pump. That would mean more hardship for the economy as banks, big business,  and governments alike take their losses and wipe the slate clean, essentially starting over but this time at levels that the private sector ‘pump’ can run on its own. Keynesian economics is like bad motor oil, it may loosen things up for a while, but over time that oil turns into sludge and it must be dealt with.

Mr. Reich, we agree that the nation is and will be in a recessionary environment for a very long time, but we are at opposite ends of the planet on how to remedy it. I want a solution that fosters organic and sustainable growth, your solution of more of the same is akin to injecting RedBull and caffeine into the veins of the economy to speed it up. But you know what happens to people when they drink RedBull? They usually come crashing down after the effects wear off.

The economy of the United States, and many other nations have now seen what a Keynesian policy does, the hard way. And the idea of just continuing the “same as before” policy will destroy the nation in the end.

Taxi Drivers Recruited To Help Colorado Springs Police

Colorado Springs, Colorado is in such dire financial troubles that they have even gone as far as to turn off 1/3rd of all the street lights in the city. The city is hoping a new program called “Adopt a Streetlight” will provide enough income to turn the lights back on. Wow, what I always wanted, to pay money out of my own pocket to turn on the municipal street light.

And taxi drivers have been recruited by the dwindling police force to serve as eyes on the road.

Taxi drivers have been recruited to serve as a second set of eyes for stretched police patrols. Residents can pay $100 a year to adopt a street light. Volunteers are organizing to empty the garbage cans in 128 neighborhood parks. The city is asking private swimming programs to operate its pools, and one of the city’s four community centers soon will be run by a church. (WSJ)

Taxi drivers as eyes for the police.. Oh, that will work out real well (sarcasm intended)

 

New Jersey Teachers Could Face Upwards Of 10,950 Layoffs Under Governor Christie’s Budget Cuts

As I reported on yesterday (New Jersey Cuts Pension Contributions And Cuts Aid To Schools), the impact of the Governor’s plan to cut school aid by $820 million is already being discussed at just about all school boards across the state. School boards are already facing their own budget issues and they rely on the aid from the state to help offset some of the costs.

There are more than a handful of school systems around the state that should be shut down entirely for poor performance and wasteful spending at the tax payers expense. But, in many of the smaller towns and municipalities there are some good schools, and some good teachers. And it is likely that the smaller the community, the deeper the impact will be under Governor Christie’s planed budget cuts as it is the smaller towns that are experiencing more of a declining student population and revenues.

I already know of some school boards in my part of the state that are projecting upwards of 10% reduction in staffing should the budget cuts become reality. The layoff calculation is based on the NJ Department of Education 2009 stated number of teachers in the state, and that number is 112,933. The New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) states that their membership is 178,858 teachers, and this number includes support staff. As it is likely that the budget cuts will impact the support staff as well as the teachers I have simply taken the difference between the two in order to be conservative in my calculation. And I also estimate that the staffing cuts will range between 5% and 10%, so to keep things simple I used 7.5% as a middle of the road figure. Based on these conservative calculations it is that I estimate that upwards of 10,950 teachers and staff will be directly impacted in New Jersey.

Should the average staff reductions be closer to the 10% number then staff reductions could climb to 14,590.

This will likely be a very heated and contentious battle, and it is likely to end up in the courts. 

New Jersey Cuts Pension Contribution And Cuts Aid To Schools

The newly seated Governor Chris Christie is taking hard steps to curtail costs. His plans won’t be popular to say the least.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie proposed a $29.3 billion budget that would suspend property-tax rebates, skip the state’s $3 billion pension contribution and fire 1,300 workers next year. […]

The plan would reduce aid to schools by $820 million, towns by $446 million and higher education by $173 million. […]

Christie said he will ask lawmakers to institute an immediate 2.5 percent spending cap on state and local governments. The legislation would be used until a permanent, constitutional amendment can be approved. […]

[…]“All this is doing is pushing the state’s budget problems down to the local property taxpayers,” Assembly Budget Committee chair Louis Greenwald, a Cherry Hill Democrat, said in an interview yesterday. “I get the argument that the wealthiest New Jerseyans have options, but I wish they would get the message that many middle-class taxpayers don’t.” […] (Business Week)

Here in the State of New Jersey we have the highest property tax of any state in the nation. The property tax rebate (aka homestead rebate) was, albeit not much, at least something to offset the record high property taxes in New Jersey. Without the tax rebate to offset property taxes it amounts to a property tax increase for New Jersey home owners.

A reduction in aid to municipalities has a deep trickle down impact. Towns of all sizes, who are already facing their own budget problems will be forced to either raise local taxes, or curtail services even further, thus increasing those who are forced out of a job.

More on this topic (What's this?)
The Enforcement Tax
Massive Public School Layoffs Ahead
Read more on Property Tax, Education in the US at Wikinvest

Credit Rating Of The United States At Risk Says Moody’s Ratings

Moody’s is going to fire a shot across the bow of the USS Obama administration on Monday. The warning shot will state that even the current budget plan that the Obama administration has laid out may still not be enough to save the the AAA rating of the United States.

[…] unless the country gets public finances into better shape than the Obama administration projects there would be “downward pressure” on its triple A credit rating.

Examining the administration’s outlook for the federal budget deficit, the agency said: “If such a trajectory were to materialize, there would at some point be downward pressure on the triple A rating of the federal government.” […]

[…] Pierre Cailleteau, head of sovereign ratings at Moody’s, said: “The size of debt makes the US vulnerable to an interest rate shock . . . but the level of fiscal ambition is not one that secures for sure the [triple A] rating.”

Moody’s worries that the government will struggle to get political agreement either to raise tax revenues significantly from their current low of 14.8 per cent of national income, or to cut federal spending far from its high of 25.4 per cent of national income.

The report follows concerns recently expressed about the US public finances from the other large rating agencies. Standard & Poor’s warned last week the triple A status of the US was at risk unless the country adopted a credible medium-term plan to rein in fiscal spending. Fitch Ratings issued a critical report on the US in January.[…] (The full article can be found at the FT)

Now all three of the ratings agencies have put the United States on notice. Either cut spending by significant amounts, or raise taxes significantly. Which way do you think the administration will go?

More on this topic (What's this?)
US Closer to Losing AAA Rating
Caught napping, sorry folks…
Dollar rises on new dollar fears
Read more on Credit Ratings Agencies, Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

Deficit Worse Than Previously Expected

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in its new report issues today shows the budget deficit to be even worse than that of President Obama’s own projections.

[…] The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that Obama’s budget plans would generate deficits over the upcoming decade that would total $9.8 trillion. That’s $1.2 trillion more than predicted by the administration.

The agency says its future-year predictions of tax revenues are more pessimistic than the administration’s. That’s because CBO projects slightly slower economic growth than the White House.

The deficit picture has turned alarmingly worse since the recession that started at the end of 2007, never dipping below 4 percent of the size of the economy over the next decade. Economists say that deficits of that size are unsustainable and could put upward pressure on interest rates, crowd out private investment in the economy and ultimately erode the nation’s standard of living. […]

[…] The report says that extending tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 under GOP President George W. Bush and continuing to update the alternative minimum tax so that it won’t hit millions of middle-class taxpayers would cost $3 trillion over 2011-2020. The tax cuts expire at the end of this year and Obama wants to extend them — except for individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples making $250,000.

For the ongoing budget year, CBO predicts a record $1.5 trillion deficit. That’s actually a little better than predicted by the White House, but at 10 percent of gross domestic product, it’s bigger than any deficit in history other than those experienced during World War II. […]

I am old enough to remember when a Trillion dollars was a big deal.