Citigroup – Not One Good Thing To Say About Them

Citigroup (NYSE:C) is having a garage sale. Actually the sale has been going on for a long time. The problem is that no one is stopping by.

Citigroup tried to be so big and powerful in the 90’s and early 2000’s. They got their hands into everything and anything, and have made a complete mess of it all. Personally, I would put Citigroup’s responsibility in the entire financial disaster at about 20%. That is a lot when taken in context of all the banks and other Wall Street firms that have contributed to the meltdown.

Citigroup has had a long list of CEO’s that ran the company into the ground. Even Vikram Pandit, the current CEO is out of touch with reality. Forget about too big to fail, Citigroup qualifies as a company too stupid and arrogant to survive.

Citigroup is attempting to sell it’s credit card business, mortgages, brokerage operations, a door-to-door insurance business, and a ski lodge it owns. Many of the products and services it had hoped would make the company the financial superpower of the world.

Now that the dream is gone, the New York company is working hard to get rid of assets it no longer wants, still haunting Citigroup more than two years after the financial crisis hit. Fourteen months into the sales process, though, it is clear executives are in for a long, hard slog.

Citigroup, the third-largest U.S. bank-holding company by assets behind Bank of America Corp. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., has shed just one-fourth of the roughly $715 billion in assets it moved into a unit called Citi Holdings in January 2009. Citigroup’s overall asset size as of Dec. 31 was down 4.2% from a year earlier, to $1.86 trillion, compared with J.P. Morgan Chase’s 6.6% decline.

The slow-moving merchandise is making it harder for Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram Pandit to turn around the company’s bottom line, frustrating some investors. Analysts expect core businesses to churn out an impressive $16 billion in profits this year, but credit losses on the garage-sale assets likely will hit $13 billion.

That would give Citigroup its first full-year profit since 2007, but nowhere near the $21.54 billion it made in 2006.

The company’s strategy seems to be that "we’ll ride it out, and it will get better eventually," said Moshe Orenbuch, a bank analyst at Credit Suisse Group. Some investors want "to see more urgency on their part." Regulators also are pressing Citigroup to move quickly, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Pandit told analysts and investors this month that the company "will continue to reduce Citi Holdings over time through business dispositions, asset sales and organic run-off." While more than 15 businesses have been sold, dumping the rest likely will take at least until the end of next year, executives said.

Extricating the company from its past mistakes is a major part of Mr. Pandit’s campaign to convince skeptics on Wall Street and in Washington that there is no need for a forced dismemberment of Citigroup. […] (WSJ)

An orderly dismemberment of Citigroup is exactly what should be done. To the point where nothing is left of the worst bank in modern times.

I have received many emails over the past 18 months or so from individuals sharing their own experience dealing with Citibank and/or Citimortgage. Not one of them was favorable of the company. From customer support calls being routed to Singapore or other off shore Countries, no follow-ups on mortgage workouts, claims of lost documentation, and a never ending routing from one person to another. Why anyone still banks with this filth of a company is beyond me.

For me I use a credit union and a small regional bank, and have been happy with them ever since. Consider moving your money away from the big blood suckers into a credit union or small regional bank that is safe. The move your money campaign provides links regional banks safety ratings.

Remember the “Move Your Money” campaign is still alive and well!




Robert Rubin – Virtually Nobody Saw It Coming

Robert Rubin, you remember him. The once chairman of Citigroup, once Treasury Secretary under Clinton, and even once Goldman Sachs chairman. Well Robert Rubin has opened his mouth at a gathering in New York and said …

“virtually nobody” — himself included — foresaw the financial meltdown. (source: HuffPo)

He was the Treasury Secretary who in 1999 had a hand in the abolishment of the Glass-Steagall act. The very law that, if left intact to this day, would have lessened (if not outright prevented) the financial meltdown experienced over the past nearly three years now. Robert Rubin was even suspected of asking for the rating agencies to go easy on Enron because Citigroup stood to lose big if Enron’s ratings were downgraded.

We all know how Enron ended up.

So Mr.Rubin thinks that virtually nobody foresaw the financial meltdown. Wow! That is a bold statement there Robert. You do need to get out more often, or at least read a few editorials (and blogs) from time to time. There were plenty of people waving warning flags before the proverbial brown stuff hit the fan. While serving on the Board at Citigroup you were in part responsible for ensuring the banks practices would not harm the company, or its shareholders. That did not work out too well either, did it Bob.

Robert Rubin stands as a model of arrogance, greed, and a bloated view of self worth. You stood at every intersection in time when you could have stopped the chain of events that led to the pile up on the interstate. Instead, you simply turned a blind eye and was the voice of deregulating the financial system. It’s as if you pulled the plug on the traffic signals thinking that highways don’t need to be regulated by those red and green lights any longer. In real life that would cause disastrous accidents. In the financial world it created what we have today.

Robert Rubin, open your eyes, just once, and look around at what your deregulation band wagon has created.




December Master Trust Data and Charge Offs

Some of the major banks issued their monthly ‘master trust’ data yesterday. This data reveals the the amount of money that is delinquent, and the amount being charged off. It is still a mind boggling amount of money that is delinquent. Consumers are fine? I don’t think so.

Citigroup Inc Reports Dec Master Trust; Net Charge offs 9.56% v 10.29% m/m

- 5-34 days $2.5B v $2.49B m/m
- 35-64 days $1.17B v $1.22B m/m
- 65-94 days $972M v $979.8M m/m
- 95-124 days $869M v $872.7M m/m

American Express Co Reports Dec Master Trust; Net write offs on managed basis 7.1% v 7.6% m/m

- Annualized default rate net of recoveries 6.9% v 7.5% m/m
- 30 days past due loans on owned basis 3.7% v 3.9% m/m
- 30 days past due loans on managed basis 3.7% v 3.9% m/m

JPMorgan Chase and Co Reports Dec Master Trust; Net charge offs 7.11% v 8.81% m/m

- Delinquencies 4.94% v 4.90% m/m
- 30-59 days 1.13% v 1.23% m/m
- 60-89 days 0.99% v 1.12% m/m
- 90+ days 2.82% v 2.55% m/m

Bank of America Corp Reports Dec Master Trust; Net Charge offs 13.53% v 13.00% m/m

- Delinquencies 7.44% v 7.69% m/m
- 30-59 days $1.62B v $1.78B m/m
- 60-89 days $1.44B v $1.48B m/m
- 90-119 days $1.25B v $1.33B m/m
- Total delinquencies $6.72B v $6.93B m/m

Discover Financial Services Reports Dec Master Trust: Net charge offs 8.68% v 8.98% m/m

- Delinquencies 5.49% v 5.68% m/m
- 30-59 days $529.7M v $545.6M m/m
- 60-89 days $432.6M v $456.8M m/m
- 90-119 days $401.3M v $402.9M m/m
- Total delinquency amount ending balance $2.08B v $2.09B m/m
- Gross charge offs 9.64% v 9.91% m/m

Capital One Financial Corp Reports Dec Master Trust; Net Charge Offs 10.14% v 9.6% in Nov m/m – filing

- US Card 30 day+ delinquency rate: 5.78% v 5.87% m/m
- International Net charge off rate: 9.58% v 9.50% m/m
- Auto finance metrics annualized net charge off rate: 5.68% v 3.67% m/m
- US Card managed receivables $60.3B v $60B m/m

More on this topic (What's this?)
Could Millions of Homes Be Foreclosure Proof?
Germans don't trust the American economy
Read more on Trust at Wikinvest

CitiGroup – IRS Cuts Deal Allowing CitiGroup To Skip Tax Payments

Citigroup (Citibank) gets special tax break from the IRS in a deal that allows Citigroup to forgo certain tax obligations saving the financial firm $38 billion.

The federal government quietly agreed to forgo billions of dollars in potential tax payments from Citigroup as part of the deal announced this week to wean the company from the massive taxpayer bailout that helped it survive the financial crisis.

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday issued an exception to long-standing tax rules for the benefit of Citigroup and a few other companies partially owned by the government. As a result, Citigroup will be allowed to retain billions of dollars worth of tax breaks that otherwise would decline in value when the government sells its stake to private investors.

While the Obama administration has said taxpayers are likely to profit from the sale of the Citigroup shares, accounting experts said the lost tax revenue could easily outstrip those profits.[...] (Source: Washington Post)

This is absolutely insane at all levels. The Government makes a huge deal about financial firms paying back the TARP funds, saying how great it is and that it shows the economy is returning to health.

But behind closed doors they slide them tax breaks that will likely cost us (tax payers) more in the long run. Citigroup dilutes existing shareholders by issuing new shares to help raise the cash needed for the TARP payback, and then the Government allows them to essentially skip town on $38 billion in taxes. This is not healthy operations, it is a sophisticated shell game and it is us, the tax payers, who are under the shell being moved around.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Every Dog Has Its Day, Even Citigroup
The FDIC is Not Buying What Citi is Selling
Read more on Citigroup, Taxes at Wikinvest

Can Corporations Earn Money And Have Morals At The Same Time?

Can a ‘for profit’ corporation enjoy healthy revenues year after year and exhibit good morals at the same time? The largest companies in the nation have evolved over the years to find more ways to streamline operations, reduce waste, increase the productivity of their employees, preached corporate ethics to their employees, try to be involved with local communities by giving to the local youth clubs or donations to a regional cancer research center. But is this to be a good citizen of the community, or is it a show?

Corporations have moved further and further away from encouraging independent thought of their employees to one of ‘corporate thought’. Six Sigma programs have swept across corporate America like wildfire. Employees are being driven to compete against one another, strive to be their absolute best, and to achieve the Six Sigma black belt. Corporations scour the college campuses looking for future managers and leaders. They hire graduates right as they hang up their cap and gown and indoctrinate them into ‘their’ corporate mentality. To begin the brain washing as early as possible before they can discover the concept of free thought.

Ethics, as defined in the dictionary:

1. the body of moral principles or values governing or distinctive of a particular culture or group: the Christian ethic; the tribal ethic of the Zuni.

2. a complex of moral precepts held or rules of conduct followed by an individual: a personal ethic.

Corporations preach loudly that they embrace a corporate ethics policy. Employees in some companies are required to attend mandatory ethics training. And some companies even require the employees to sign a statement that they understand and will follow the corporate ethics policy. The purpose of an ethics policy is to tell the employees what is right and wrong. Don’t cheat, be honest with the customers, don’t commit fraud, treat all people equally, don’t exchange money from the Government and/or subcontractors in return for preferred treatment. The list goes on and on.

But what really is all of this ethics stuff? As defined in the Websters definition shown above, it is a “body of moral principles“. My question however is whose moral principals? A corporate defined morality, or a standard of morals that is generally accepted by everyday people who work hard and raise a family?

[Read more...]

CitiBank Forces You To Spend Money, Or Else

During this entire economic crisis I have seen many stupid and/or irresponsible actions taken by the banks and investment firms. But this one from CitiBank is so stupid and irresponsible that it leaves me astonished that anyone that is a customer is willing to sit back and take this.

If you are a CitiBank credit card customer you are already well aware of your interest rates going up significantly, or you have had CitiBank cut your credit limits, and in some cases had your account held for ransom by telling you to pay the 29.99% interest rate or they will cancel your card altogether leaving you ‘stranded for credit’.

CitiBank has repeatly abused and taken advantage of its customers. Now what I am about to tell you amounts to CitiBank holding a gun to your face and robbing you.

CitiBank says that they will soon be offering ‘rebates’ that will help offset some of the interest rate hikes. But how does one get this ‘rebate’? You have to spend more money by charging more purchases to your CitiBank credit card.

From the Associated Press:

For Citibank credit card holders, there is one way to escape the bank’s rate hikes currently under way: Meet a monthly spending requirement.

Those who meet the spending minimum — in some cases $750 a month — will be able to get a rebate on their total interest charges for that month. The rebate could cover some or all of the interest rate hike. Customers also need to make payments on time to qualify for the rebate.[...]

The change by Citi comes as the industry rushes to adjust to sweeping reforms to start in February that will limit when and how much card issuers can hike interest rates. In a statement, Citi said the actions were necessary given elevated losses from souring loans and “regulatory changes that eliminate repricing for that risk.” [...]

[...] Citi’s move is just the latest in a series of rate hikes, lowered limits and other term changes credit card customers have seen in the past year. [...]

So if you spend at least $750.00 per month then you can get a rebate applied to your account of some amount to help offset the costs of the higher interest rates and higher fees. On the surface that may sound wonderful (if you are naive). But what you are really doing is putting yourself further into debt with the illusion of having a lower interest rate.

What CitiBank is doing is no different than a drug dealer who threatens his junkie by telling him that he can get his drugs cheaper if he buys even more.

If you are still a customer of CitiBank after all they have done to you so far and have taken your tax dollars (tens of billions worth in bailouts), then I must tell you that you need to WAKE UP!

Face the facts people. CitiBank is still in financial trouble, otherwise they would have not needed billions of dollars in financial aid (tax payer money). They got themselves into the mess they are faced with and are forcing YOU to bail them out.

Tell them you have had enough. Cancel your checking account, cancel your credit card, eliminate any business ties with CitiBank. Don’t let them take advantage of you any longer.

CitiBank through its own devices dug its own grave, now they want YOU to be the one that occupies it. It is way past the time for this zombie bank to occupy its own grave.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Every Dog Has Its Day, Even Citigroup
The FDIC is Not Buying What Citi is Selling
Read more on Citigroup, Interest Rates at Wikinvest

The Economy Has Been Saved…

… and Bernie Madoff was a caring and honest man.

The Dow Industrial average reached 10,000 with CNBC staff wearing caps that read ‘DOW 10,000‘ and will run a “special” DOW 10,000 TV show this evening.

STOP THE INSANITY

The economy has not been saved, only disguised… akin to putting lipstick on ENRON years ago and calling it a great investment.

Banks and other financial institutions have only been able to report revenues because they no longer have to record ‘actual‘ losses, as long as they don’t sell it they can put whatever value on it they want. We have Congress and the FASB for that brilliant move.

Is Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan CEO) on ‘your‘ side?

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:38:07 AM
JPMorgan Chase and Co CEO Dimon: Consumer Protection Agency will be “damaging”; will cost customers.

Uhhh, what he is really trying to say is that regulations will be damaging to JP Morgan. I am sure all of the Wall Street firms will scream how bad regulations will be for the consumer if they are forced to be controlled or regulated in any way.

Unfortunately our Government caves in to the demands of Wall Street faster than a 5 dollar hooker will drop her panties, so any meaningful regulation or safe guards will be nothing but ‘show’ and no meat.

Whatever happened to Obama’s pledge that lobbyists will not be an outside force that can influence Washington? Stupid me, I forgot that many lobbyists ‘are’ part of the Government. So in a way he kept his promise by putting them on staff.

Will regulation ever see the light of day, as opposed to the Government just talking it up? Yes, but it will be so one sided that the regulations will most likely provide ‘additional‘ loop holes in which the Wall Street firms will be able to capitalize from. 

There is only one regulation that will work, yet no one in Washington will dare say the word… Glass-Steagall Act. There was one individual that discussed putting Glass-Steagall back and that was Sen. Ted Kennedy.

With the placement of pen to paper the President can issue an executive order to reinstate this regulation which was abolished in 1998. If you want to know why no one in Washington speaks about this you only have to look at the President’s key financial advisers… such as Larry Summers who praised the abolishment of Glass-Steagall back in 1998. The very same people who contributed to the mess the nation is in now are right back at it again.

The middle class are the new ATM machine, but this time it is Wall Street firms like JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and Citigroup et. al. who have the card and ‘you‘ are the machine giving cash to them. They ‘got ya’ when things were good by taking advantage of every loop hole they could capitalize on, and now they are out to ‘get ya’ once again by standing in the way of  ‘any’ meaningful financial reform from being passed.

And why was the media claiming that JP Morgans quarterly results were a sign of strong economic recovery? From what I read this morning I see things as still bad.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:58:55 AM
JPMorgan Chase and Co Card services unit see losses of approx 10.5% through H1 2010 – Investor slides
- Card service unit losses seen at 9.0% in Q4 2009 and 11% in Q1 2010
- WaMu losses could approach 24% through next ‘several quarters’
- Overall: If economy weakens further, additional reserving actions may be required
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:38:07 AM
JPMorgan Chase and Co CEO Dimon:   Corporate lending continues to trend around all time lows, extended credit lines continue to be drawn at very light levels.
I guess CNBC ‘forgot’ to mention the bad parts ;)

To Mr. Dimon… If you are wondering what is happening in the “real world” and if your losses will grow then just take a look at the growing ‘tent cities’ all around the country. Oh, maybe you already know about them because you have your people out their trying to milk a few more bucks from their “tent mortgage“.

Don’t worry, President Obama has everything under control and will quickly move to solve this problem:

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 3:49:13 PM
White House: Pres Obama supports a $250 payment to seniors, veterans, and the disabled; program could cost up to $13B
- payment may include approx 57M individuals

Wow! $250 bucks, that will go a long way in helping people hurt by the financial disaster. The Government estimates that 57 million individuals may qualify for the 250 buck payment. That is if they can find addresses for those who are now living in tents.

Video wrap up will be late this evening…

Red Roof Inn Can’t Pay The Bill

Opps! There goes another one…

Red Roof Inn Inc., a hotel chain popular with business travelers on a budget, defaulted on $367 million face amount of mortgage debt, the latest hotel casualty in an industry that has been hard hit by the recession.

The defaults were reported by credit-rating company Realpoint LLC based on reports by the mortgages’ servicing company. Red Roof confirmed the defaults Tuesday.[...]

“As a result of the extraordinary stress in the hospitality industry and the economy overall, we have entered into some restructuring discussions with our lenders,” said Andrew Alexander, an executive vice president of Red Roof. “It has had no effect on our company operations or our franchise operations.”

[...]The debt on Red Roof’s properties is multilayered and complicated, hinting that Citigroup and the now-defunct Bear Stearns hadn’t finished securitizing some of it when the market for commercial mortgage backed securities, or CMBS, shut down in the summer of 2008, according to CMBS analysts. A Citigroup representative declined to comment. At least $367 million of Red Roof’s debt is in securitized mortgages. Another $655 million is in mortgages not securitized, and $164 million is mezzanine debt.

Extended Stay Inc., which operates roughly 680 hotels catering to budget-minded travelers on long trips, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on June 15. Of Extended Stay’s $7.4 billion in debt, $4.1 billion is a securitized mortgage.[...]

[...]In 2007, Red Roof was acquired from Accor SA for $1.3 billion by a group led by Citigroup Inc.’s Global Special Situations Unit and including hotel manager Westmont Hospitality Group[...] Source: WSJ

Acquired by Citigroup“… LOL. Citigroup is still the worst financial institution in my opinion. They are still living off the public teet and today we learn they are going to raise the salaries by 50% for their employees. Must be nice to be able to legally feed off the public. Where are your morals Citigroup? Oh, your a bank, there are none.