<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis &#187; FDIC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/tag/fdic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net</link>
	<description>Providing Stock Market Analysis and Economic Commentary without the Hype</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Failures For Week Ending June 18, 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/06/20/bank-failures-for-week-ending-june-18-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/06/20/bank-failures-for-week-ending-june-18-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Security Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=11182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nevada Security Bank, Reno, Nevada, was closed today by the Nevada Financial Institutions Division, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/06/20/bank-failures-for-week-ending-june-18-2010/">Bank Failures For Week Ending June 18, 2010</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; color: #000000; font-size: x-small;"><img class="size-full wp-image-11184 alignleft" style="margin: 2px 5px;" title="nevada security bank" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/nevada-security-bank.png" alt="nevada security bank" width="153" height="153" /></span></span></p>
<p>Nevada Security Bank, Reno, Nevada, was closed today by the Nevada Financial Institutions Division, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Umpqua Bank, Roseburg, Oregon, to assume all of the deposits of Nevada Security Bank.</p>
<p>The five branches of Nevada Security Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of Umpqua Bank. Depositors of Nevada Security Bank will automatically become depositors of Umpqua Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers of Nevada Security Bank should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Umpqua Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other Umpqua Bank branches to process their accounts as well.{&#8230;}</p>
<p>The FDIC and Umpqua Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $368.2 million of Nevada Security Bank&#8217;s assets. Umpqua Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. {&#8230;}</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2010/pr10137.html" target="_blank">Information for customers of Nevada Security Bank</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/06/20/bank-failures-for-week-ending-june-18-2010/">Bank Failures For Week Ending June 18, 2010</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/06/20/bank-failures-for-week-ending-june-18-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One in Ten Banks Is a &#8220;Problem&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent FDIC’s latest banking health report now shows 775 banks, or one-tenth of all U.S. banks are classified as “problem institutions”.<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/">One in Ten Banks Is a &ldquo;Problem&rdquo;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The recent FDIC’s latest banking health report now shows 775 banks, or one-tenth of all U.S. banks are classified as “problem institutions”.</p>
<p>The 775 problem banks is up from 702 in the previous banking report from the prior quarter. The cause indicated for the increase in problem banks is the rise in bad commercial real estate loans.</p>
<blockquote><p>[…] Poor loan performance in other sectors also continued to hurt banks, with the total number of loans at least three months past due climbing for the 16th consecutive quarter, FDIC officials said in a briefing on Thursday. &quot;The banking system still has many problems to work through, and we cannot ignore the possibility of more financial market volatility,&quot; FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said.[…]</p>
<p>[…] FDIC officials said they expected the number of failed banks to peak this year after climbing steadily over the past three years. Regulators have shut 72 banks so far this year, more than double the number closed by this time last year. Ms. Bair said regulators were preparing for a steady pace of additional closures through the end of the year. A total of 237 banks have failed since the beginning of 2008.</p>
<p>The failures continue to strain the FDIC&#8217;s fund to protect consumer deposits, although officials signaled they were confident they had enough cash on hand to deal with the expected spate of failures, without having to assess new fees on the banking industry. <strong>The agency&#8217;s deposit insurance fund stood at negative-$20.7 billion at the end of the first quarter</strong>, a slight improvement from the end of 2009. (emphasis added) (<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256680430484878.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection" target="_blank">WSJ</a>)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A slight improvement? Looks like they are still broke to me.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/">One in Ten Banks Is a &ldquo;Problem&rdquo;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/22/one-in-ten-banks-is-a-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Reform &#8211; Another Shell Game Leaves Tax Payers on the Hook</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Geithner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate leaders agree to a modification in the financial reform bill that may place the taxpayers at even greater risk. The financial reform bill just gets worse and worse.<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/">Financial Reform &ndash; Another Shell Game Leaves Tax Payers on the Hook</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The financial reform bill has a backdoor bailout clause that would have utilized $50 Billion of funds set aside to be used when another big bank needed a bailout or winding down. This backdoor bailout is a fact, even with some politicians, and the President, saying it was no such thing.</p>
<p>Well now it gets worse. Tonight senate leaders agreed to scrap the $50 Billion fund and instead use a system by which the FDIC would provide the necessary funding to handle the failed institution. The source of this new funding would be accomplished by setting up a new line of credit with the treasury department, and it would be backed by the failed company’s assets.</p>
<p>Ok, so let us walk through this one. The first idea in the bill was to set aside $50 Billion, which Geithner claimed would have been funded by the big institutions themselves. The reason it has been referred to as a backdoor taxpayer bailout is that the increased levies on the big banks would simply be passed along to the tax payer.</p>
<p>So then if in the future a Citigroup, or Bank of America for example needed another bailout or needed to be ring fenced if the firm goes into core meltdown then the funds would be drawn from the $50 Billion reserve.</p>
<p>Now, the newest idea is even worse than the first one. Under this agreement the $50 Billion is scrapped altogether. In its place will be a new credit line established between the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">treasury department</span> taxpayer and the FDIC. So if a Citigroup for example goes into a meltdown then the firm would be wound down and costs to perform the bailout / wind down would be provided by the FDIC / Treasury credit line. And when the nuclear dust settles the assets of the firm will be sold to reimburse the Treasury.</p>
<blockquote><p>[…] Aides to the committee chairman, Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, and the panel’s senior Republican, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, said the two senators had agreed to scuttle a $50 billion fund proposed by Democrats.</p>
<p>The fund, which was opposed by the Obama administration, drew criticism from Republicans who had warned that it would promote rather than prevent taxpayer bailouts of failed financial companies.</p>
<p>Under the deal, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would finance the liquidation of failed financial companies, <strong>using a new credit line with the Treasury Department backed by the failed company’s assets. The money would be recouped later through the sale of assets</strong>, with shareholders and creditors forced to take losses.[…] emphasis added (<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/business/05regulate.html?ref=business" target="_blank">NYT</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem with this ridiculous plan is that the taxpayers only get reimbursed if the assets of the failed firm are enough to cover the original outlay of funds that were needed to wind them down. It puts the taxpayers on the hook yet again for Wall Street screw ups. Only this time it is disguised even better with the FDIC being front and center, and behind the FDIC is the treasury and taxpayers.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;">I don’t see things as optimistically as the NYT does. Take for example the bank failures of the past 18 months. When the FDIC moves in a seizes the bank they establish an estimate of what the costs will be to the insurance fund. In later months, the FDIC issues additional reports on the failed bank, and in many instances the true cost ends up being much higher than first estimated when it is discovered that the assets the institution was holding was worth much less than what was being reported. We have mark to myth accounting rules to thank for that.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="background-color: #fafafa;">So if the <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">treasury</span> taxpayer is going to be reimbursed by the assets held from the failed institution then I say this is just one more shell game being played on the American people.</span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/">Financial Reform &ndash; Another Shell Game Leaves Tax Payers on the Hook</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/05/04/financial-reform-another-shell-game-leaves-tax-payers-on-the-hook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDIC Insurance Fund is Broke to the Tune of Nearly $21 Billion</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deposit Insurance Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Federal deposit Insurance Company released the latest quarterly banking profile. There is much information contained within this latest report and I will highlight the important parts for you here: The most important revelation is that the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), the money available to pay back customers at failed banks, has dropped to [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/">FDIC Insurance Fund is Broke to the Tune of Nearly $21 Billion</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Today the Federal deposit Insurance Company released the latest quarterly banking profile. There is much information contained within this latest report and I will highlight the important parts for you here:</p>
<p>The most important revelation is that the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), the money available to pay back customers at failed banks, has dropped to a record low.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) decreased by $12.6 billion during the fourth<a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2232010113213AM.png" target="_blank"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="2-23-2010 11-32-13 AM" border="0" alt="2-23-2010 11-32-13 AM" align="right" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2232010113213AM_thumb.png" width="173" height="285" /></a> quarter to a <strong>negative $20.9 billion</strong> (unaudited) primarily because of $17.8 billion in additional provisions for bank failures. Also, unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities combined with operating expenses reduced the fund by $692 million. Accrued assessment income added $3.1 billion to the fund during the quarter, and interest earned, combined with termination fees on loss share guarantees and surcharges from the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program added $2.8 billion. For the year, the fund balance shrank by $38.1 billion, compared to a $35.1 billion decrease in 2008.</p>
<p>The DIF’s reserve ratio was negative 0.39 percent on December 31, 2009, down from negative 0.16 percent on September 30, 2009, and 0.36 percent a year ago. The December 31, 2009, <strong>reserve ratio is the lowest reserve ratio for a combined bank and thrift insurance fund on record.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/DIFReserveRatioGraph.png" target="_blank"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="DIF Reserve Ratio Graph" border="0" alt="DIF Reserve Ratio Graph" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/DIFReserveRatioGraph_thumb.png" width="244" height="138" /></a> </p>
</blockquote>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444">In layman&#8217;s terms, the FDIC is in the hole by nearly $21 Billion, and it is very likely that they are tapping their $500 Billion credit agreement with the US.<strike>Treasury</strike> taxpayers.</font></p>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444">The number of banking institutions that the FDIC has identified as ‘problem institutions’ has risen once again and now stands at 702 with assets of $403 Billion. If there is $403 Billion in assets recognized as being contained in problem banks, and the insurance fund is negative $21 Billion then where will the money come from to pay our insurance claims when these banks fail? Taxpayers, that&#8217;s where.</font></p>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444">The FDIC also reported that loan losses rose for the 12th consecutive quarter.</font></p>
<blockquote><p>Asset quality indicators worsened in the fourth quarter. Net charge-offs (NCOs) totaled $53.0 billion, an increase of $14.4 billion (37.2 percent) over the same period in 2008. The annualized net charge-off rate rose to 2.89 percent, up from 1.95 percent a year earlier and 2.72 percent in the third quarter of 2009. This is the highest quarterly NCO rate reported by the industry in the 26 years for which quarterly NCO data are available. […]</p>
</blockquote>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444">Noncurrent loans still growing</font></p>
<blockquote><p>Noncurrent loans and leases continued to rise through the end of the year, with a few notable exceptions. The total amount of loans and leases that were noncurrent (90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status) increased by $24.3 billion (6.6 percent) in the fourth quarter, to $391.3 billion, or 5.37 percent of all loans and leases at yearend. This is the highest level for the industry’s noncurrent rate in the 26 years that all insured institutions have reported noncurrent loan data. The increase in noncurrent loans in the quarter was largely driven by noncurrent residential mortgage loans, which rose by $23.2 billion (14.9 percent).[…]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>All in all the FDIC looks to be in sad shape. Expect to see FDIC Chairwoman Shelia Bair to be before Congress again this year trying to explain why it is that the insurance fund is broke and what she is going to do about it.</p>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444"></font></p>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444"></font></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><font style="background-color: #fafafa" color="#444444">&#160;</font></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/">FDIC Insurance Fund is Broke to the Tune of Nearly $21 Billion</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/02/23/fdic-insurance-fund-is-broke-to-the-tune-of-nearly-21-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Failure Friday &#8211; Barnes Banking Company, St. Stephen State Bank, and Town Community Bank &amp; Trust</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnes Banking Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Stephen State Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town Community Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Friday and another day of the FDIC rapid response team going into action. Today’s targets of acquisition were Barnes Banking Company of Kaysville, UT, St. Stephen State Bank,St. of Stephen,MN, and Town Community Bank &#38; Trust of Antioch,IL: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 15, 2010 Barnes Banking Company, Kaysville, Utah, was closed today by the [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/">Bank Failure Friday &ndash; Barnes Banking Company, St. Stephen State Bank, and Town Community Bank &amp; Trust</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Another Friday and another day of the FDIC rapid response team going into action. Today’s targets of acquisition were Barnes Banking Company of Kaysville, UT, St. Stephen State Bank,St. of Stephen,MN, and Town Community Bank &amp; Trust of Antioch,IL: </p>
</p>
<blockquote><p align="left"><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE       <br />January 15, 2010 </strong></p>
<p align="left"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="logo-barnes" border="0" alt="logo-barnes" align="left" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/logobarnes.gif" width="244" height="37" /> Barnes Banking Company, Kaysville, Utah, was closed today by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC created the Deposit Insurance National Bank of Kaysville (DINB), which will remain open until February 12, 2010 to allow depositors access to their insured deposits and time to open accounts at other insured institutions.</p>
<p align="left">At the time of closing, the receiver immediately transferred to the DINB all insured deposits of Barnes Banking Company, except for brokered deposits, certificates of deposits (CDs) and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The receiver also transferred to the DINB all secured deposits by public entities.</p>
<p align="left">The FDIC will mail checks directly to customers with CDs and IRAs. For the brokered deposit customers, the FDIC will pay the brokers directly for the amount of their insured funds. Customers with brokered deposits should contact their brokers directly for information concerning their money.</p>
<p align="left">The main office and all branches of Barnes Banking Company will open from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., on Saturday. The DINB will maintain Barnes Banking Company&#8217;s normal business hours thereafter. Zions First National Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, will provide operational management of the DINB. Banking activities, such as direct deposit and writing checks, ATM and debit cards, can continue normally for former customers of Barnes Banking Company until February 12, 2010. Barnes Banking Company official checks will continue to clear and will be issued to customers closing accounts.</p>
<p align="left">All insured depositors of Barnes Banking Company are encouraged to transfer their insured funds to other banks during this transitional period. They may do so by asking their new bank to electronically transfer their deposits from the DINB or by writing checks for the amount in their accounts. For depositors who have not closed or transferred their accounts on or before February 12, 2010, the FDIC will mail checks to the address of record for the amount of the insured funds.</p>
<p align="left">Under the FDI Act, the FDIC may create a deposit insurance national bank to ensure that depositors have continued access to their insured funds where no other bank has agreed to assume the insured deposits. This arrangement allows for uninterrupted direct deposits and automated payments from customers&#8217; accounts and allows them time to find another institution with which to do business.</p>
<p align="left">As of September 30, 2009, Barnes Banking Company had $827.8 million in total assets and $786.5 million in total deposits. At the time of closing, there were approximately $100,000 in deposit funds that potentially exceeded the insurance limits. Uninsured deposits were not transferred to the DINB. This estimate is likely to change once the FDIC obtains additional information from these customers.</p>
<p align="left">Customers with accounts in excess of $250,000 should contact the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-528-4893 to set up an appointment to discuss their deposits. This phone number will be operational this evening until 9 p.m., Mountain Standard Time (MST); on Saturday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., MST; on Sunday from noon to 6 p.m., MST; and thereafter from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., MST. Customers who would like more information on today&#8217;s transaction should visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/barnes.html">http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/barnes.html</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Beginning Monday, depositors of Barnes Banking Company with more than $250,000 at the bank may visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web page &quot;Is My Account Fully Insured?&quot; at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www2.fdic.gov/dip/Index.asp">http://www2.fdic.gov/dip/Index.asp</a> to determine their insurance coverage.</p>
<p align="left">The FDIC as receiver will retain all the assets from Barnes Banking Company for later disposition. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p align="left">The cost to the FDIC&#8217;s Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to be $271.3 million. Barnes Banking Company is the fourth bank to fail this year and the first in Utah. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was America West Bank, Layton, on May 1, 2009.</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE       <br />January 15, 2010 </strong></p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="st stephen state bank logo" border="0" alt="st stephen state bank logo" align="left" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ststephenstatebanklogo.png" width="244" height="37" /> St. Stephen State Bank, St. Stephen, Minnesota, was closed today by the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First State Bank of St. Joseph, St. Joseph, Minnesota, to assume all of the deposits of St. Stephen State Bank.</p>
<p>The two branches of St. Stephen State Bank will reopen during normal business hours as branches of First State Bank of St. Joseph. Depositors of St. Stephen State Bank will automatically become depositors of First State Bank of St. Joseph. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from First State Bank of St. Joseph that it has completed systems changes to allow other First State Bank of St. Joseph branches to process their accounts as well.</p>
<p>This evening and over the weekend, depositors of St. Stephen State Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p>As of September 30, 2009, St. Stephen State Bank had approximately $24.7 million in total assets and $23.4 million in total deposits. First State Bank of St. Joseph did not pay the FDIC a premium to assume all of the deposits of St. Stephen State Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the St. Stephen State Bank, First State Bank of St. Joseph agreed to purchase essentially all of the failed bank&#8217;s assets.</p>
<p>The FDIC and First State Bank of St. Joseph entered into a loss-share transaction on $20.4 million of St. Stephen State Bank&#8217;s assets. First State Bank of St. Joseph will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers. For more information on loss share, please visit: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html">http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html</a>.</p>
<p>Customers who have questions about today&#8217;s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-591-2845. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Central Standard Time (CST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., CST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., CST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., CST. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/ststephen.html">http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/ststephen.html</a> .</p>
<p>The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $7.2 million. First State Bank of St. Joseph&#8217;s acquisition of all the deposits was the &quot;least costly&quot; resolution for the FDIC&#8217;s DIF compared to all alternatives. St. Stephen State Bank is the third FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Minnesota. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Prosperan Bank, Oakdale, on November 6, 2009.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE       <br />January 15, 2010 </strong></p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="logo-towncommunity" border="0" alt="logo-towncommunity" align="left" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/logotowncommunity.gif" width="192" height="69" /> Town Community Bank and Trust, Antioch, Illinois, was closed today by the Illinois Department of Financial Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First American Bank, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Town Community Bank and Trust.</p>
<p>The sole branch of Town Community Bank and Trust will reopen on Saturday as a branch of First American Bank. Depositors of Town Community Bank and Trust will automatically become depositors of First American Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use the former Town Community Bank and Trust branch until they receive notice from First American Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other First American Bank branches to process their accounts as well.</p>
<p>This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Town Community Bank and Trust can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p>As of September 30, 2009, Town Community Bank and Trust had approximately $69.6 million in total assets and $67.4 million in total deposits. First American Bank did not pay the FDIC a premium to assume all of the deposits of Town Community Bank and Trust. In addition to assuming all of the deposits, First American Bank agreed to purchase approximately $67.6 million of Town Community Bank and Trust&#8217;s assets. The FDIC retained the remaining assets for later disposition.</p>
<p>The FDIC and First American Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $56.2 million of Town Community Bank and Trust&#8217;s assets. First American Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers. For more information on loss share, please visit: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html">http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html</a>.</p>
<p>Customers who have questions about today&#8217;s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-877-894-4710. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Central Standard Time (CST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., CST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., CST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., CST. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/towncommunity.html">http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/towncommunity.html</a>.</p>
<p>The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $17.8 million. First American Bank&#8217;s acquisition of all the deposits was the &quot;least costly&quot; resolution for the FDIC&#8217;s DIF compared to all alternatives. Town Community Bank and Trust is the second FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Independent Bankers&#8217; Bank, Springfield, on December 18, 2009.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/">Bank Failure Friday &ndash; Barnes Banking Company, St. Stephen State Bank, and Town Community Bank &amp; Trust</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2010/01/16/bank-failure-fdic-rapid-response-team-barnes-banking-company-kaysville-ut-st-stephen-state-bank-st-stephen-mn-town-community-bank-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FDIC Reserve Is Gone</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/24/the-fdic-reserve-is-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/24/the-fdic-reserve-is-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Bair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=9394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cash reserves needed for the FDIC to keep paying depositors at failed banks has all been used up. Don&#8217;t panic (yet anyways), the FDIC has an open credit line to the Treasury Department (uh, that means us tax payers) that will keep the FDIC floating in cash to keep paying out money to Grandma [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/24/the-fdic-reserve-is-gone/">The FDIC Reserve Is Gone</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The cash reserves needed for the FDIC to keep paying depositors at failed banks has all been used up. Don&#8217;t panic (yet anyways), the FDIC has an open credit line to the Treasury Department (uh, that means us tax payers) that will keep the FDIC floating in cash to keep paying out money to Grandma and Grandpa at the failed banks.</p>
<p>You see, the FDIC is supposed to be self maintaining, it charges banks a fee to have their deposits insured. Think of it as the banks paying an insurance premium. That money goes into the FDIC kitty and is used to pay depositors when a bank fails. That is all well and good except when the financial system blows up like it has over the past 2 years.</p>
<p>As of today&#8217;s quarterly report issued by the FDIC they are now broke, and I mean that in the literal sense.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> FDIC deposit insurance fund now <span style="color: #ff0000;">-$8.2B</span> v $10.4B last quarter</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, they are broke, no money left in the cash drawer. So what now? As long as the FDIC has an open credit line with the Treasury then any bank that fails it will be the taxpayers who reimburse Grandma and Grandpa.</p>
<p>Think of it this way: you have a checking account at (let&#8217;s pick a name out of the air) ShittyBank and they get closed by the FDIC. Your very own money will be reimbursed to you via the FDIC insurance fund, but you will actually be paying yourself back in part because taxpayers will be on the hook to keep the FDIC floating in funds. So in the end you still lose some money.</p>
<p>The FDIC has recently asked member banks to pre-pay insurance premiums for the next 3 years in an attempt to fund the reserve pool as quickly as possible. But many smaller banks are objecting to this as it will further cut into their balance sheets. Besides, will prepayment of 3 years of insurance premiums be enough to cover the increase in bank failures that still lie ahead? I think not. In which case it will eventually end up in the tax payers lap.</p>
<p>Not only has the FDIC announced that their cash drawer is empty, but the number of banks on their hit list has grown yet again. That number now stands at 552 compared to 416 just in the previous quarter.</p>
<p>Recall that just a couple months ago the <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/05/09/fdic-plans-for-more-bank-failures/" target="_blank">FDIC opened a satellite office</a> in Florida with a staff of roughly 500 to deal with the bank issues (aka future bank failure) in the Southeast region. Expect more bank failures from Florida and surrounding states in the future.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/24/the-fdic-reserve-is-gone/">The FDIC Reserve Is Gone</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/24/the-fdic-reserve-is-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barney Franks Tells Regulators to Be &#8220;Deaf, Dumb, and Blind&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/04/barney-franks-tells-regulators-to-be-deaf-dumb-blind/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/04/barney-franks-tells-regulators-to-be-deaf-dumb-blind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC Cease and Desist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=9290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow&#8217;s Wall Street Journal paper will be running the story that House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank has sent a letter to top banking regulators to &#8220;go easy on small banks&#8221;. You did read that correctly. Barney Frank essentially says that enforcing bank regulations is hurting the small banks so he wants the bank [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/04/barney-franks-tells-regulators-to-be-deaf-dumb-blind/">Barney Franks Tells Regulators to Be &#8220;Deaf, Dumb, and Blind&#8221;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Tomorrow&#8217;s Wall Street Journal paper will be running the story that House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney</p>
<div id="attachment_9291" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 290px">
	<a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Fotolia_4610679_XS.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-9291 " style="border: 0pt none;" title="Business communication" src="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Fotolia_4610679_XS.jpg" alt="Deaf, Dumb, and Blind" width="290" height="145" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Deaf, Dumb, and Blind</p>
</div>
<p>Frank has sent a letter to top banking regulators to &#8220;go easy on small banks&#8221;.</p>
<p>You did read that correctly. Barney Frank essentially says that enforcing bank regulations is hurting the small banks so he wants the bank police to go deaf, dumb, and blind.</p>
<blockquote><p>[...] House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D., Mass.) sent a letter to the country&#8217;s top bank regulators, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair, urging them to &#8220;show some temperance in their regulation of traditional banks.&#8221; One common complaint from lawmakers is that regulators&#8217; tough examinations are making banks reluctant to lend.</p>
<p>&#8220;A self-fulfilling prophecy of community bank failures, shrinking credit availability and a slower economic recovery can all result from a regulatory overreaction to the current crisis,&#8221; said the letter, which also was signed by Rep. Walt Minnick (D., Idaho).</p>
<p>Federal bank regulators have hit hundreds of banks with formal and informal sanctions this year, ordering them to boost capital requirements &#8212; reserves set aside to cover possible losses &#8212; and sometimes to shake up management. Regulators have closed 115 banks since January, and bankers across the country are complaining examiners are criticizing the health of even the strongest banks.[...]</p>
<p>[...] Mr. Frank&#8217;s letter complains examiners are enforcing &#8220;unofficial&#8221; capital requirements that are higher than the normal standard. Secondly, it says examiners are focusing bank reviews mainly on asset quality and not other measures of a bank&#8217;s health. Third, it says &#8220;banks are being forced&#8221; to write down the value of assets to their market value, which can lead to &#8220;artificially low prices.&#8221;</p>
<p>A day after Mr. Frank&#8217;s letter, Timothy W. Long, chief national bank examiner at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, sent a memo to the agency&#8217;s examiners about new rules for commercial real-estate lending. In the memo he addressed the criticism examiners are facing.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have refuted and will continue to refute accusations that examiners are being &#8216;too tough&#8217; or are creating the so-called credit crunch by their actions,&#8221; he wrote, according to a copy of the memo reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. [...]</p></blockquote>
<p>By telling the bank regulators to lighten up on the smaller banks will simply allow the creation of an <span style="text-decoration: underline;">army of zombie banks</span>. Over leveraging and bad loans contributed greatly to the economic collapse. Now when enforcing banking regulations are <span style="text-decoration: underline;">paramount</span> to restoring trust in &#8216;the system&#8217;,Â  Barney Frank just wants the regulators to go soft on them.</p>
<p>This is analogous to telling the police not to look at the burglar going into the banks. Except in this situation the burglars are running the banks.</p>
<p>What is Barney Frank so upset about anyway? The following list is directly from the FDIC press release files. Clicking on any of the contained links will bring up the full report issued by the FDIC against the said named bank. A lot of the findings are in the category of &#8216;unsafe banking practices&#8217; and these reports are a warning to the bank to get its act together.</p>
<p>By the way, just about every bank failure so far has appeared on this list &#8216;before&#8217; they failed.</p>
<p>FDIC Cease and Desist Orders &#8211; Updated November 4, 2009</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="View FDIC Cease and Desist Orders for 2009 - updated November 4 2009 on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/22136914/FDIC-Cease-and-Desist-Orders-for-2009-updated-November-4-2009">FDIC Cease and Desist Orders for 2009 &#8211; updated November 4 2009</a> <object id="doc_138327990248757" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="580" height="600" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="doc_138327990248757" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="play" value="true" /><param name="loop" value="true" /><param name="scale" value="showall" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="devicefont" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="menu" value="true" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="mode" value="list" /><param name="src" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=22136914&amp;access_key=key-2n7hskxb4i9zb3106wqw&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=list" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="doc_138327990248757" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="580" height="600" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=22136914&amp;access_key=key-2n7hskxb4i9zb3106wqw&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=list" mode="list" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" menu="true" bgcolor="#ffffff" devicefont="false" wmode="opaque" scale="showall" loop="true" play="true" quality="high" align="middle" name="doc_138327990248757"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/04/barney-franks-tells-regulators-to-be-deaf-dumb-blind/">Barney Franks Tells Regulators to Be &#8220;Deaf, Dumb, and Blind&#8221;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/11/04/barney-franks-tells-regulators-to-be-deaf-dumb-blind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Failure: Riverview Community Bank (Otsego, MA) Bank nÂ° 105 To Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-riverview-community-bank-otsego-ma-bank-n%c2%b0-105-to-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-riverview-community-bank-otsego-ma-bank-n%c2%b0-105-to-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverview Community Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=9209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This last bank closes the round of five failed banks this week. It will be however noted that these are mostly &#8220;small&#8221; or regional banks and that they have been bought up by competitors, which gives a real illustration of the economic function of a recession: weeding out the unnecessary or unprofitable companies or individuals. [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-riverview-community-bank-otsego-ma-bank-n%c2%b0-105-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Riverview Community Bank (Otsego, MA) Bank nÂ° 105 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">This last bank closes the round of five failed banks this week. It will be however noted that these are mostly &#8220;small&#8221; or regional banks and that they have been bought up by competitors, which gives a real illustration of the economic function of a recession: weeding out the unnecessary or unprofitable companies or individuals. In general, it is precisely the reason for which recessions are often followed by longer periods of economic growth.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">While the number of 100 failed banks may seem a bit striking, it should not be forgotten that in the end, banks are businesses like any other. They also fail. Hence, the use of a guarantee mechanism like the FDIC. The issue could be when (and more importantly, &#8220;if&#8221;) the failed banks&#8217; losses go beyond the financing capabilities of the FDIC.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
October 23, 2009</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Riverview Community Bank, Otsego, Minnesota, was closed today by the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Central Bank, Stillwater, Minnesota, to assume all of the deposits of Riverview Community Bank.</p>
<p>The two branches of Riverview Community Bank will reopen on Saturday as branches of Central Bank. Depositors of Riverview Community Bank will automatically become depositors of Central Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branches until Central Bank can fully integrate the deposit records of Riverview Community Bank.</p>
<p>This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Riverview Community Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p>As of August 31, 2009, Riverview Community Bank had total assets of $108 million and total deposits of approximately $80 million. Central Bank did not pay the FDIC a premium to assume all of the deposits of Riverview Community Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Central Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.</p>
<p>The FDIC and Central Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on approximately $75 million of Riverview Community Bank&#8217;s assets. Central Bank will share in the losses on the assets covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-sharing arrangement is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The agreement also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers. For more information on loss share, please visit: http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html.</p>
<p>Customers who have questions about today&#8217;s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-355-0814. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time (CDT); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., CDT; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., CDT; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., CDT. Interested parties can also visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/riverview-mn.html.</p>
<p>The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $20 million. Central Bank&#8217;s acquisition of all the deposits was the &#8220;least costly&#8221; resolution for the FDIC&#8217;s DIF compared to alternatives. Riverview Community Bank is the 105th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the Nation this year, and the fifth in Minnesota. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Jennings State Bank, Spring Grove, on October 2, 2009.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-riverview-community-bank-otsego-ma-bank-n%c2%b0-105-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Riverview Community Bank (Otsego, MA) Bank nÂ° 105 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-riverview-community-bank-otsego-ma-bank-n%c2%b0-105-to-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Failure: Bank of Elmwood, Racine, Wisconsin, Is Bank nÂ° 104 To Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-bank-of-elmwood-racine-wisconsin-is-bank-n%c2%b0-104-to-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-bank-of-elmwood-racine-wisconsin-is-bank-n%c2%b0-104-to-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Elmwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=9207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 23, 2009 Bank of Elmwood, Racine, Wisconsin, was closed today by the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Tri City National Bank, Oak Creek, Wisconsin, to assume all [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-bank-of-elmwood-racine-wisconsin-is-bank-n%c2%b0-104-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Bank of Elmwood, Racine, Wisconsin, Is Bank nÂ° 104 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
October 23, 2009</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Bank of Elmwood, Racine, Wisconsin, was closed today by the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Tri City National Bank, Oak Creek, Wisconsin, to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Elmwood.</p>
<p>The five branches of Bank of Elmwood will reopen on Saturday as branches of Tri City National Bank. Depositors of Bank of Elmwood will automatically become depositors of Tri City National Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until Tri City National Bank can fully integrate the deposit records of Bank of Elmwood.</p>
<p>This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Bank of Elmwood can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p>As of September 30, 2009, Bank of Elmwood had total assets of $327.4 million and total deposits of approximately $273.2 million. Tri City National Bank did not pay the FDIC a premium for the deposits of Bank of Elmwood. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Tri City National Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Customers who have questions about today&#8217;s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-234-9027. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time (CDT); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., CDT; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., CDT; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., CDT. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/elmwood.html.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $101.1 million. Tri City National Bank&#8217;s acquisition of all the deposits was the &#8220;least costly&#8221; resolution for the FDIC&#8217;s DIF compared to alternatives. Bank of Elmwood is the 104th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the Nation this year, and the first in Wisconsin. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was The First National Bank of Blanchardville, Blanchardville, on May 9, 2003.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-bank-of-elmwood-racine-wisconsin-is-bank-n%c2%b0-104-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Bank of Elmwood, Racine, Wisconsin, Is Bank nÂ° 104 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-bank-of-elmwood-racine-wisconsin-is-bank-n%c2%b0-104-to-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Failure: Flagship National Bank (Bradenton, FL) Bank NÂ° 103 To Fail</title>
		<link>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-flagship-national-bank-bradenton-fa-bank-n%c2%b0-103-to-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-flagship-national-bank-bradenton-fa-bank-n%c2%b0-103-to-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flagship National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rebeltraders.net/?p=9205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 23, 2009 Flagship National Bank, Bradenton, Florida, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First Federal Bank of Florida, Lake City, Florida, [...]<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-flagship-national-bank-bradenton-fa-bank-n%c2%b0-103-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Flagship National Bank (Bradenton, FL) Bank NÂ° 103 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
October 23, 2009</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Flagship National Bank, Bradenton, Florida, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First Federal Bank of Florida, Lake City, Florida, to assume all of the deposits of Flagship National Bank.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The four branches of Flagship National Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of First Federal Bank of Florida. Depositors of Flagship National Bank will automatically become depositors of First Federal Bank of Florida. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from First Federal Bank of Florida that it has completed systems changes to allow other First Federal Bank of Florida branches to process their accounts as well.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Flagship National Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">As of August 31, 2009, Flagship National Bank had total assets of $190 million and total deposits of approximately $175 million. First Federal Bank of Florida did not pay the FDIC a premium for the deposits of Flagship National Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, First Federal Bank of Florida agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The FDIC and First Federal Bank of Florida entered into a loss-share transaction on approximately $130 million of Flagship National Bank&#8217;s assets. First Federal Bank of Florida will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share arrangement is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The agreement also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers. For more information on loss share, please visit: http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/lossshare/index.html.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Customers who have questions about today&#8217;s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-355-0650. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EDT; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EDT; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EDT. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC&#8217;s Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/flagship.html.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $59 million. First Federal Bank of Florida&#8217;s acquisition of all the deposits was the &#8220;least costly&#8221; resolution for the FDIC&#8217;s DIF compared to alternatives. Flagship National Bank is the 103rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the Nation this year, and the ninth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Hillcrest Bank Florida, Naples, which also closed today.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-flagship-national-bank-bradenton-fa-bank-n%c2%b0-103-to-fail/">Bank Failure: Flagship National Bank (Bradenton, FL) Bank NÂ° 103 To Fail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://blog.rebeltraders.net">Rebel Traders - Stock Market and Economic Analysis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rebeltraders.net/2009/10/24/bank-failure-flagship-national-bank-bradenton-fa-bank-n%c2%b0-103-to-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
