Goldman Sachs Settles SEC Charges – Admits No Guilt

Goldman Sachs and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have agreed to a settlement in the fraud charge levied against the company back on April 16th.

In the settlement with the SEC,  Goldman Sachs avoids having to admit any guilt in connection with the fraud charge.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2010-123

Washington, D.C., July 15, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Goldman, Sachs & Co. will pay $550 million and reform its business practices to settle SEC charges that Goldman misled investors in a subprime mortgage product just as the U.S. housing market was starting to collapse.

In agreeing to the SEC’s largest-ever penalty paid by a Wall Street firm, Goldman also acknowledged that its marketing materials for the subprime product contained incomplete information.

In its April 16 complaint, the SEC alleged that Goldman misstated and omitted key facts regarding a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) it marketed that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities. Goldman failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, known as ABACUS 2007-AC1, particularly the role that hedge fund Paulson & Co. Inc. played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that Paulson had taken a short position against the CDO.

In settlement papers submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Goldman made the following acknowledgement:

Goldman acknowledges that the marketing materials for the ABACUS 2007-AC1 transaction contained incomplete information. In particular, it was a mistake for the Goldman marketing materials to state that the reference portfolio was “selected by” ACA Management LLC without disclosing the role of Paulson & Co. Inc. in the portfolio selection process and that Paulson’s economic interests were adverse to CDO investors. Goldman regrets that the marketing materials did not contain that disclosure.

“Half a billion dollars is the largest penalty ever assessed against a financial services firm in the history of the SEC,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “This settlement is a stark lesson to Wall Street firms that no product is too complex, and no investor too sophisticated, to avoid a heavy price if a firm violates the fundamental principles of honest treatment and fair dealing.”

Lorin L. Reisner, Deputy Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, added, “The unmistakable message of this lawsuit and today’s settlement is that half-truths and deception cannot be tolerated and that the integrity of the securities markets depends on all market participants acting with uncompromising adherence to the requirements of truthfulness and honesty.”

Goldman agreed to settle the SEC’s charges without admitting or denying the allegations by consenting to the entry of a final judgment that provides for a permanent injunction from violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933. Of the $550 million to be paid by Goldman in the settlement, $250 million would be returned to harmed investors through a Fair Fund distribution and $300 million would be paid to the U.S. Treasury. (emphasis added)

The landmark settlement also requires remedial action by Goldman in its review and approval of offerings of certain mortgage securities. This includes the role and responsibilities of internal legal counsel, compliance personnel, and outside counsel in the review of written marketing materials for such offerings. The settlement also requires additional education and training of Goldman employees in this area of the firm’s business. In the settlement, Goldman acknowledged that it is presently conducting a comprehensive, firm-wide review of its business standards, which the SEC has taken into account in connection with the settlement of this matter.

The settlement is subject to approval by the Honorable Barbara S. Jones, United Sates District Judge for the Southern District of New York.

Today’s settlement, if approved by Judge Jones, resolves the SEC’s enforcement action against Goldman related to the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO. It does not settle any other past, current or future SEC investigations against the firm. Meanwhile, the SEC’s litigation continues against Fabrice Tourre, a vice president at Goldman.

The SEC investigation that led to the filing and settlement of this enforcement action was conducted by the Enforcement Division’s Structured and New Products Unit, led by Kenneth Lench and Reid Muoio, and including Jason Anthony, N. Creola Kelly, Melissa Lamb, and Jeffrey Leasure. Additionally, together with Deputy Director Reisner, Richard Simpson, David Gottesman, and Jeffrey Tao have been handling the litigation.

——

The SEC will attempt to convince the public that they won. The reality of the situation is that Goldman Sachs won. They got away with a crime and they know it in my opinion.




Goldman Sachs Outlook Revised to NEGATIVE

Fitch has issued a statement moments ago indicating that they have revised their outlook on Goldman Sachs (GS) to negative.

While the credit rating remains at A+, the outlook is deteriorating on the growing concerns that Goldman Sachs will suffer long term damage, and warrants the outlook change from stable to negative in my view.

The Goldman Sachs Group IncFitch revises outlook to Negative from Stable; affirms A+ ratings – The Rating Outlook revision to Negative incorporates recent legal developments and ongoing regulatory challenges that could adversely impact Goldman’s reputation and revenue generating capacity. Goldman’s franchise and market position are potentially vulnerable to scrutiny by stakeholders, and like peers, may be affected by the industry’s regulatory evolution.




Goldman Sachs Fraud Case Being Investigated for Criminal Charges

Could handcuffs be in Lloyd Blankfein’s future wardrobe?

The Securities and Exchange Commission has referred its investigation of Goldman Sachs to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution, less than two weeks after filing a civil securities fraud case against the firm, according to a source familiar with the matter.[…]

[…] Under civil law, the SEC does not have to prove that Goldman set out to defraud investors — only that it did. But criminal law would require prosecutors to show that Goldman maliciously planned to mislead its investors.[…] (Washington Post)

Lloyd, I don’t know if they have gold plated handcuffs just for you. You may have to be content with peasant stainless steel.

Goldman Sachs Insiders Sell Stock at Levels Not Seen in Three Years

A few people at Goldman Sachs thought it was a good idea to unload shares after the firm received their Wells Notice (which Goldman Sachs did NOT disclose – that is also a violation of full disclosure)

Five senior executives of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., including the firm’s co-general counsel, sold $65.4 million worth of stock after the firm received notice of possible fraud charges, which later drove its stock down 13%.

Sales by three of the five Goldman insiders occurred at prices higher than the stock’s current level. The stock sales by co-general counsel Esta Stecher, vice chairmen Michael Evans and Michael Sherwood, principal accounting officer Sarah Smith and board member John Bryan occurred between October 2009 and February 2010. It was the most active spate of insider selling in three years, according to InsiderScore.com in Princeton, N.J., which tracks and analyzes purchases and sales of stocks by top executives and directors.

Goldman received notice of the possible charges last July, but didn’t publicly disclose that fact, later explaining that it didn’t consider such a notice material information investors would have needed to value the stock. A week ago, on April 16, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil-fraud charges against Goldman for failing to disclose that a short seller, Paulson & Co., participated in selection of assets in a pool tied to subprime mortgages.[…]

[…]Ben Silverman, director of research at InsiderScore.com, said the insider selling since October "was the most aggressive" at Goldman in three years, since late 2006 through early 2007.[…]  (WSJ)

AIG Considers Suing Goldman Sachs

“AIG, the US government-controlled insurer, is considering pursuing Goldman Sachs over losses incurred on $6bn of insurance deals on mortgage-backed securities similar to the one that led to fraud charges against the US bank.”

(See full article at Financial Times)

Goldman Sachs Gets into Deeper Water by the Day

This is getting really interesting now. Goldman Sachs is sliding further into trouble as more and more damaging emails are being leaked. The emails essentially acknowledge that Goldman Sachs was knowingly selling garbage to its large institutional clients (pension funds and the like) while knowing, and admitting in email traffic, that the investments were “shitty”.

Thomas Montag, the former head of sales and trading in the Americas at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., called a set of mortgage-linked investments sold by his firm {Goldman Sachs} “one shi**y deal,” according to an excerpt from internal e-mails released today by Senate lawmakers.

The transaction was Timberwolf Ltd., a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation holding pieces of other CDOs, according to a statement today from the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The CDO also included optimistic side-bets on the performance of CDOs, or derivatives, in which the firm took the opposite pessimistic side in “many” cases, the panel said.

“Boy that timberwo[l]f was one shi**y deal,” Montag, who is now Bank of America Corp.’s president of global banking and markets, said in a June 22, 2007, e-mail to Daniel Sparks, who ran Goldman Sachs’s mortgage business at the time, according to the panel’s statement. Within five months of Timberwolf’s debut, the CDO had lost 80 percent of its value, and it was liquidated in 2008, according to the panel. (Bloomberg)

Even the one of Wall Street’s biggest players Jim Cramer, who has been known to bend the rules in the past is the ‘head cheese’ of the TheStreet.Com (which is also under an SEC investigation for possible violations in how it represented revenues – Reuters), said today that this looks bad for Goldman Sachs. Wow Jim, such a change in your view from just several days ago when you claimed it was nothing.

Must watch television tomorrow:

On CSPAN3, beginning at 10:00 am (US EST) will be the hearing with Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and VP Fabulous Fabrice Tourre.

You can also watch this via the internet at CSPAN.ORG, remember that it is tentatively scheduled to appear on CSPAN3.

Tomorrows testimony by Goldman Sachs will not be unlike the great Pecora Committee hearings which followed the Great Depression. Then, JP Morgan was on the hot seat and it was a circus show, literally.

JP Morgan sits with midget at Senate Hearings Jack Morgan, called to testify by yet another set of Congressional investigators, had a circus midget plopped in his lap to the delight of a swarm of photo-journalists who memorialized the moment for millions. It was an emblematic photo, a visual metaphor for a once proud, powerful elite, its gravitas gone, reduced to impotence, ridiculed for its incompetence and no longer capable of intimidating a soul.

Let us hope that Lloyd Blankfein does not show up tomorrow with a midget, or other circus performer on his lap. If Lloyd Blankfein still thinks his company is “doing Gods work”, then perhaps he may feel that he has God as his attorney.

Yeah, this should be good.

Goldman Sachs and the Fabulous Fab

Lloyd Blankfein is steaming mad. I envision a man who right now has fire and sparks shooting from his ears and his annoying squeaky voice has transformed into the voice of the incredible hulk. Yes, Blankfein is furious. Furious that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Government itself would dare question the morality of the most powerful Wall Street firm in history.

Goldman Sachs claims they operate under the highest ethical standards anywhere. Even the notion that someone might question their ethics is enough to bring out the Goldman squid squad of the highest priced lawyers in North America (honey, who’s knocking on the door?)

Goldman Sachs has been working throughout the weekend putting together what they will say on Tuesday when Lloyd Blankfein will be on Capital Hill to answers questions.

I’m starting to think that the case the SEC has against Goldman Sachs may actually be stronger than some, including me, originally thought.

Over the weekend additional emails were released to the public that are darn near a smoking gun if there ever is one. And I also believe at this point now that the SEC has even more on Goldman that has yet to be made known.

When the announcement was first made that the SEC was pursuing fraud charges against Goldman my first reaction was one of great joy, but I also thought that the SEC better have their ducks properly lined up otherwise Goldman will squash the government and the SEC like a small insect, and Goldman has the power to do it.

But the information contained in the emails released this weekend sure does not look for Goldman Sachs and their VP Fabrice Touree, aka Fabulous Fab.

The Washington Post has obtained some juicy emails, these written by the Fabulous Fab, Fabrice Tourre.

[…] In one Jan. 27, 2007, e-mail, Tourre suggests he knew he was creating risky securities that were likely to not succeed. “Not feeling too guilty about this, the real purpose of my job is to make capital markets more efficient . . . amazing how good I am in convincing myself!!!”

In March 7, 2007, e-mail, Tourre refers to Dan Sparks, head of Goldman’s mortgage business: The “US subprime business situation is that it is not too brilliant. . . . According to Sparks, that business is totally dead, and the poor little subprime borrowers will not last so long!”

Just over a month later, Tourre sold an investment to clients who wanted to bet the housing market would continue to rise.

In a subsequent e-mail, Tourre wrote that he sold the investment “to widows and orphans that I ran into at the airport.” (Washington Post)

And these from Senator Levin:

Goldman Sachs Emails – Exhibits

Could it be true, could the SEC actually have enough evidence to prove without any doubt that Goldman Sachs conducted fraud? I sure hope so, and I hope that it has a huge trickle down effect that brings out many other cockroaches in the process.

Goldman Sachs (GS) – More ABACUS Troubles

I’m sure this news did not please the Church of Goldman

S&P cuts ABACUS 2005-2 Ltd. Class C Rating To ‘CC’ from CCC-

- The downgrade follows a number of recent defaults within the transaction’s underlying portfolio. Specifically, write-downs in the underlying reference portfolio have caused the class C notes to incur a partial principal loss.

Blankfein god