Rebel Traders – Analysis Without The Hype

Bank executive pleads guilty for overvaluing bank assets.

The former vice president of the failed Omni National Bank intentionally marked mortgage assets higher after the bank got caught with a significant amount of bad loans.

If this former bank executive is being charged, and now having plead guilty to, overstating the value of their assets then what does this say about the entire banking system as it now stands with “mark to guess” accounting rules? With many banks and other institutions marking their mortgage assets at higher values then what they are currently worth, then should not these executives also be charged with fraud? I say lock them all up!

ATLANTA — A former executive at a failed Atlanta bank pleaded guilty Thursday to charges that he overvalued bank assets in a scheme that prosecutors said helped hide bloated accounting figures that could have alerted regulators to massive mortgage fraud.

The guilty plea of Jeffrey L. Levine is the latest aftershock of the failure of the Atlanta-based Omni National Bank, which was taken over by federal regulators in March. Levine, the bank’s former executive vice president, is one of at least four people with ties to the bank to face federal charges since it collapsed.

Levine, 68, could face 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million on charges that he cooked the bank’s books to mask millions of dollars in losses on loans designed for investors who rehab run-down houses.

Levine’s community redevelopment department doled out high-interest short-term loans to borrowers with lackluster credit who promised to renovate and then resell or rent houses in struggling neighborhoods, according to federal prosecutors.

But when the market collapsed and the bank was left with a string of foreclosures, prosecutors said Levine inflated the value of the loans to make it look like the bank’s finances were in a stronger position than they really were.[…] Source: Daily Citizen (H/T Butch)

The FDIC again publishes terrible news for the banking industry. The institutions insured by the FDIC lost about 3.7 Bn for Q2 alone. This comes as Meredith Whitney, the analyst reputed for predicting failure for Citigroup and success for GS, predicted that about 300 banks to fail by the end of 2009.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 27, 2009

Commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) reported an aggregate net loss of $3.7 billion in the second quarter of 2009, a decline of $8.5 billion from the $4.8 billion in profits the industry reported in the second quarter of 2008. Insured institutions earned $424 million in net operating income during this latest quarter even after a special assessment of $5.5 billion to bolster the FDIC’s insurance fund. However, one-time losses and other items totaling $4.1 billion pulled the industry results into negative territory.

“While challenges remain, evidence is building that the U.S. economy is starting to grow again,” said FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair. “Banking industry performance is — as always — a lagging indicator. The banking industry, too, can look forward to better times ahead. But, for now, the difficult and necessary process of recognizing loan losses and cleaning up balance sheets continues to be reflected in the industry’s bottom line.”

Chairman Bair went on to say, “The FDIC was created specifically for times such as these. No matter how challenging the environment, the FDIC has ample resources to continue protecting depositors as we have for the last 75 years. No insured depositor has ever lost a penny of insured deposits…and no one ever will.”

Provisions for loan losses totaled $66.9 billion in the quarter, an increase of $16.5 billion (32.8 percent) over the second quarter of 2008. Extraordinary losses stemming from writedowns of asset-backed commercial paper totaled $3.6 billion, compared to extraordinary losses of $366 million a year earlier. Noninterest expenses were $1.7 billion (1.7 percent) higher, primarily due to increased FDIC deposit insurance premiums.

Indicators of asset quality continued to worsen during the second quarter. Both the quarterly net charge-off rate and the percentage of loans and leases that were noncurrent (90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status) reached the highest levels registered in the 26 years that insured institutions have reported these data. Insured institutions charged off $48.9 billion in uncollectible loans during the quarter, up from $26.4 billion a year earlier, and noncurrent loans and leases increased by $40.4 billion during the second quarter. At the end of June, noncurrent loans and leases totaled $332 billion, or 4.35 percent of the industry’s total loans and leases.

“Deteriorating loan quality is having the greatest impact on industry earnings as insured institutions continue to set aside reserves to cover loan losses,” Chairman Bair noted. “Of all the major earnings components, the amount that insured institutions added to their reserves for loan losses was, by far, the largest drag on industry earnings compared to a year ago.”

All told, more than 28 percent of all insured institutions reported a net loss in the second quarter, compared with 18 percent a year earlier.

Financial results for the second quarter and first half of 2009 are contained in the FDIC’s latest Quarterly Banking Profile, which was released today. Also among the major findings:

Net interest margins improved in the quarter. The average margin (the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average interest expense of funding those assets) rose to 3.48 percent from 3.39 percent in the first quarter and 3.37 percent in the second quarter of 2008. More than half of all institutions reported higher margins than in the first quarter. Net interest income totaled $100 billion in the quarter, up from $96.6 billion a year earlier.

Net interest margins improved from the previous quarter at community banks and at larger institutions. “This is good news for community banks, since three-fourths of their revenues come from net interest income,” Chairman Bair said.

Total assets of insured institutions declined by $238 billion. A $125.5 billion decline in loan and lease balances accounted for more than half of the decline in total assets of insured institutions during the second quarter. The 1.8 percent decline in industry assets followed a $303.2 billion decline in the first quarter of 2009. Banks’ balances with Federal Reserve banks fell by $99.4 billion (20.4 percent) during the quarter, and assets in trading accounts declined by $65.5 billion (7.9 percent). The industry’s investment securities portfolio increased by $130.6 billion (5.9 percent).

The number of institutions on the FDIC’s “Problem List” rose. At the end of June, there were 416 insured institutions on the “Problem List,” up from 305 on March 31. This is the largest number of institutions on the list since June 30, 1994, when there were 434 institutions on the list. Total assets of “problem” institutions increased during the quarter from $220.0 billion to $299.8 billion, the highest level since December 31, 1993.

Total reserves of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) stood at $42 billion. Just as insured institutions reserve for loan losses, the FDIC has to provide for a contingent loss reserve for future failures. To the extent that the FDIC has already reserved for an anticipated closing, the failure of an institution does not reduce the DIF balance. The contingent loss reserve, which totaled $28.5 billion on March 31, rose to $32.0 billion as of June 30, reflecting higher actual and anticipated losses from failed institutions. Additions to the contingent loss reserve during the second quarter caused the fund balance to decline from $13.0 billion to $10.4 billion. Combined, the total reserves of the DIF equaled $42.4 billion at the end of the quarter.

Chairman Bair distinguished the DIF’s reserves from the FDIC’s cash resources, which included $22 billion of cash and U.S. Treasury securities held as of June 30, as well as the ability to borrow up to $500 billion from the Treasury. “A decline in the fund balance does not diminish our ability to protect insured depositors,” Chairman Bair concluded.