Calls for Tim Geithner and Larry Summers to Resign

House minority leader John Boehner (R) today has called for Treasury Secretary Timmy Geithner and White House adviser Larry Summers to resign.

Boehner said President Obama’s team lacks “real-world, hands-on experience” in creating jobs that are needed for a full economic recovery. The Republican lawmaker cited reports that some senior aides complained of “exhaustion,” including the recently departed budget chief Peter Orszag.

“President Obama should ask for – and accept – the resignations of the remaining members of his economic team, starting with Secretary Geithner and Larry Summers, the head of the National Economic Council,” Boehner said in the morning speech to business leaders at the City Club of Cleveland. The mass dismissal, he added, would be “no substitute for a referendum on the president’s job-killing agenda. That question will be put before the American people in due time. But we do not have the luxury of waiting months for the president to pick scapegoats for his failing ‘stimulus’ policies.” {…} (Washington Post)

While I am quite sure John Boehner’s call for the Obama economic team to resign is along political party lines I have to join him in the call for Geithner and Summers to resign. This should come as no surprise to my long term readers for I have been solidly against Ben Bernanke and the Presidents economic team, especially Tim Geithner.

Ben Bernanke and his merry men at the FOMC have missed every clue leading up to the economic disaster while outsiders kept arguing (including me) that the economy was headed for the toilet.

When Mr. Tim Geithner was at the New York Fed, prior to becoming Treasury Secretary he was joined at the hip to Wall Street. It was his job to be ‘close’ to Wall Street. And as Treasury Secretary  Mr. Geithner continues his old ways with the ‘go easy on Wall Street’ approach as evidenced by the ridiculous financial reform (FINREG) bill that is now law of the land.

Larry Summers, the only good thing I have to say about Mr. Summers is, well, I’ll have to get back to you on that one because I can’t think of anything good right now.

The Obama administration did strike back today with a report from the Comical Congressional Budget Office that sates the stimulus added anywhere between 1.7 to 4.5 percent to real GDP. And that the stimulus increased the number of full time jobs by 2.0 to 4.8 million.

Ok, we have heard of the media claiming green shoots were everywhere last Spring. Now I know where all those green shoots went when they wilted, they are being smoked in Washington, D.C.

Lets say for a moment that the stimulus did add to the GDP by as much as 4.5%. What does that tell you about the ‘real economy’? Take away the stimulus and organic growth is still negative. A point I have opined about for a very long time here on my site. It is not what the stimulus does in the short term, it is the state of organic growth that matters. And with each passing day it is becoming more and more apparent just what the organic growth is really like. It’s not a pretty picture.

Impact of Stimulus




More on this topic (What's this?)
The Trouble with Tim’s Treasury
Five Observations from Successful Traders
Read more on Timothy Geithner, Tim, Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

Christina Romer Quits Obama Administration Job

christina romer as presidents council of economic advisors Christina Romer Quits Obama Administration JobPresident Obama’s chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers has called it quits. Christina Romer was a popular figure on the news channels and of course CNBC, and she was the administrations bright and cheery response to everything no matter how bad.

Christina Romer, chairwoman of Pres. Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, has decided to resign, according to a source familiar with her plans.

“She has been frustrated,” a source with insight into the WH economics team said. “She doesn’t feel that she has a direct line to the president. She would be giving different advice than Larry Summers [director of the National Economic Council], who does have a direct line to the president.” {…}

{…}The WH has been pounded for its faulty forecast that unemployment would not top 8% after its economic stimulus proposal passed. Instead, the jobless rate is 9.5%, after exceeding 10% last year. It was “a horribly inaccurate forecast,” said Bert Ely, a banking consultant. “You have to wonder why Summers isn’t the one that should be taking the fall. But Larry is a pretty good bureaucratic infighter.” (Natjournal)

Aunt Bee Christina Romer Quits Obama Administration JobIs it just me or does Christina Romer look just like Aunt Bee from the Any Griffith show? And speaking of Andy Griffith you know what he is doing now? He is pushing the new health care reform in paid television advertisements, which we the taxpayers are paying for.

.




President Obama – Approval Slide Continues

The Obama slide continues…

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 25% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -21 (see trends).

These results are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, more than two-thirds of the interviews for today’s update were conducted after the president’s speech to the nation. Tomorrow’s update will be the first based entirely upon interviews conducted after the speech. {…} (Rasmussen Report)

Obama approval ratings

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

Obama’s Favorite Bank Gets Bailed Out

The days of “there will be no more bailouts” echoed by President Obama more than one year ago have long been forgotten, apparently by the President himself.

Some of the nation’s largest banks have agreed to contribute enough money to save Chicago-based ShoreBank, the community lender with strong ties to the Obama administration, FOX Business has learned. […]

The banks have agreed to contribute $140 million to bail out the bank, while the federal government will donate tens of millions more. […]

The bailout has been controversial. Senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett served on a Chicago civic organization with a director of the bank, and President Obama himself has singled out the bank for praise in lending to low-income communities.

But the bank has made its share of bad bets, and some of the Wall Street firms that have given money have said they’ve received political pressure to contribute to the bailout of a business that under normal circumstances would have been left to fail.

It’s still unclear how much the federal government will contribute to save the bank because it’s unclear exactly how much is needed to save the institution, which without the bailout would have been taken over by the FDIC. […] (FOX)

Shorebank should be seized by the FDIC, not bailed out.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Obama's Presidential Policy, Banking at Wikinvest

Financial Reform – A Thesis on Do Nothing Constructive

Today President Obama travelled to New York City to talk about financial reform at Cooper Union’s Great Hall, founded in 1859 by Peter Cooper, one of America’s richest businessmen of the time.

It has been nearly 2 years since the financial crisis began. And in that 2 years not one corrective action has taken place, not one.

You can’t say that the credit card reform act was a good thing. It simply allowed every bank and other credit card issuer to raise interest rates to levels that even a loan shark would be envious of before the law went into effect, essentially trapping credit card users at the new higher rates.

Health Care Reform? With many of the provisions not even becoming law until 2014 this too will serve as a license for insurance companies to raise premiums and create other havoc over the next 4 years. Again, another law that will enable Wall Street firms and insurance companies to bilk the American people for whatever they can get before the law becomes active.

Now in the case of financial reform the government has accomplished nothing in the past 2 years. Lots of talk, but nothing done. So today the President spoke once again about the need to reform the financial system. Unfortunately, his statements were just as weak as the rhetoric spoken 2 years ago.

Wall Street lobbyists have twisted the arm of Washington throughout this entire time to keep a blind eye facing Wall Street. It is only because of public outrage over the destruction of the economy, at the hands of Wall Street, does the administration even talk about reform at all.

In all of it’s lack of anything meaningful glory… I present the President of the United States.

Be sure to check out my comments throughout the following transcript.

—–

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

April 22, 2010

Remarks by the President on Wall Street Reform

Cooper Union, New York, New York

11:50 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  Everybody, please have a seat.  Thank you very much.  Well, thank you.  It is good to be back.  (Applause.)  It is good to be back in New York, it is good to be back in the Great Hall at Cooper Union.  (Applause.)

We’ve got some special guests here that I want to acknowledge.  Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney is here in the house.  (Applause.)  Governor David Paterson is here.  (Applause.)  Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.  (Applause.)  State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli is here.  (Applause.)  The Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.  (Applause.)  Dr. George Campbell, Jr., president of Cooper Union.  (Applause.)  And all the citywide elected officials who are here.  Thank you very much for your attendance.

RT: Mayor Bloomberg, the guy who has been moving funds to foreign tax havens. See Bloomberg’s Offshore Millions

It is wonderful to be back in Cooper Union, where generations of leaders and citizens have come to defend their ideas and contest their differences.  It’s also good to be back in Lower Manhattan, a few blocks from Wall Street.  (Laughter.)  It really is good to be back, because Wall Street is the heart of our nation’s financial sector.

Now, since I last spoke here two years ago, our country has been through a terrible trial.  More than 8 million people have lost their jobs.  Countless small businesses have had to shut their doors.  Trillions of dollars in savings have been lost — forcing seniors to put off retirement, young people to postpone college, entrepreneurs to give up on the dream of starting a company.  And as a nation we were forced to take unprecedented steps to rescue the financial system and the broader economy.

And as a result of the decisions we made — some of which, let’s face it, were very unpopular — we are seeing hopeful signs.  A little more than one year ago we were losing an average of 750,000 jobs each month.  Today, America is adding jobs again.  One year ago the economy was shrinking rapidly.  Today the economy is growing.  In fact, we’ve seen the fastest turnaround in growth in nearly three decades.

RT: With enough taxpayer money one can buy anything, even economic data. How will it look once the pot runs dry?

But you’re here and I’m here because we’ve got more work to do.  Until this progress is felt not just on Wall Street but on Main Street we cannot be satisfied.  Until the millions of our neighbors who are looking for work can find a job, and wages are growing at a meaningful pace, we may be able to claim a technical recovery — but we will not have truly recovered.  And even as we seek to revive this economy, it’s also incumbent on us to rebuild it stronger than before.  We don’t want an economy that has the same weaknesses that led to this crisis.  And that means addressing some of the underlying problems that led to this turmoil and devastation in the first place.
Now, one of the most significant contributors to this recession was a financial crisis as dire as any we’ve known in generations — at least since the ’30s.  And that crisis was born of a failure of responsibility — from Wall Street all the way to Washington — that brought down many of the world’s largest financial firms and nearly dragged our economy into a second Great Depression.

It was that failure of responsibility that I spoke about when I came to New York more than two years ago — before the worst of the crisis had unfolded.  It was back in 2007.  And I take no satisfaction in noting that my comments then have largely been borne out by the events that followed.  But I repeat what I said then because it is essential that we learn the lessons from this crisis so we don’t doom ourselves to repeat it.  And make no mistake, that is exactly what will happen if we allow this moment to pass — and that’s an outcome that is unacceptable to me and it’s unacceptable to you, the American people.  (Applause.)

[Read more...]

Backdoor Taxes To Hit Middle Class – First It Was There, Then It Was Not

In what may be a case for CSI Miami, an article appeared in the media this morning, and shortly later any attempt to read it was replaced with “page not found’.

The first place I saw the article this morning was on the Yahoo news site, I believe it was originally a Reuters article, and Yahoo was just re-broadcasting it. Within minutes it was taken down. So I went looking for it again and I found it still up on the Canadian Yahoo site. That is where I captured the article. Good thing too, later the Canadian article was also removed.

What is with the case of the mysterious disappearing story in the mainstream media????

Here is the article, before it mysteriously disappeared:

NEW YORK – The Obama administration’s plan to cut more than $1 trillion from the deficit over the next decade relies heavily on so-called backdoor tax increases that will result in a bigger tax bill for middle-class families.

In the 2010 budget tabled by President Barack Obama on Monday, the White House wants to let billions of dollars in tax breaks expire by the end of the year — effectively a tax hike by stealth.

While the administration is focusing its proposal on eliminating tax breaks for individuals who earn $250,000 a year or more, middle-class families will face a slew of these backdoor increases.

The targeted tax provisions were enacted under the Bush administration’s Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. Among other things, the law lowered individual tax rates, slashed taxes on capital gains and dividends, and steadily scaled back the estate tax to zero in 2010.

If the provisions are allowed to expire on December 31, the top-tier personal income tax rate will rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent. But lower-income families will pay more as well: the 25 percent tax bracket will revert back to 28 percent; the 28 percent bracket will increase to 31 percent; and the 33 percent bracket will increase to 36 percent. The special 10 percent bracket is eliminated.

Investors will pay more on their earnings next year as well, with the tax on dividends jumping to 39.6 percent from 15 percent and the capital-gains tax increasing to 20 percent from 15 percent. The estate tax is eliminated this year, but it will return in 2011 — though there has been talk about reinstating the death tax sooner.

Millions of middle-class households already may be facing higher taxes in 2010 because Congress has failed to extend tax breaks that expired on January 1, most notably a "patch" that limited the impact of the alternative minimum tax. The AMT, initially designed to prevent the very rich from avoiding income taxes, was never indexed for inflation. Now the tax is affecting millions of middle-income households, but lawmakers have been reluctant to repeal it because it has become a key source of revenue.

Without annual legislation to renew the patch this year, the AMT could affect an estimated 25 million taxpayers with incomes as low as $33,750 (or $45,000 for joint filers). Even if the patch is extended to last year’s levels, the tax will hit American families that can hardly be considered wealthy — the AMT exemption for 2009 was $46,700 for singles and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly.

Middle-class families also will find fewer tax breaks available to them in 2010 if other popular tax provisions are allowed to expire. Among them:

* Taxpayers who itemize will lose the option to deduct state sales-tax payments instead of state and local income taxes;

* The $250 teacher tax credit for classroom supplies;

* The tax deduction for up to $4,000 of college tuition and expenses;

* Individuals who don’t itemize will no longer be able to increase their standard deduction by up to $1,000 for property taxes paid;

* The first $2,400 of unemployment benefits are taxable, in 2009 that amount was tax-free.

(emphasis added)

So just what gives here? Was the original Reuters story just completely wrong and they pulled it off the air? Or did someone ‘urge’ them to pull it? Let’s call in CSI Miami to figure this one out.

UPDATE: Reuters states:

The Feb 1 story headlined "Backdoor taxes to hit middle class" is wrong and has been withdrawn. The story said lower-income families will pay more under tax provisions scheduled to expire Dec 31. The Obama administration’s budget calls for the extension of those tax provisions for households earning less than $250,000. There will be no substitute story.

Why do I feel that this will come up again?

More on this topic (What's this?)
Debunking Bush Tax Cut Myths
Bold move to save on taxes
Tax schemes and financial tune-ups
Read more on Taxes, Yahoo! at Wikinvest

President Obama Will Talk About More Jobs

On Wednesday evening, President Obama will hold his State of the Union address. Advance talk is circulating that President Obama will emphasize a new push to create jobs in America. Short of creating a Works Projects Administration (WPA) type program (established during the Great Depression and was the nations biggest employer before World War II, providing nearly eight million jobs) there is simply not much the President can do.

He can spent more stimulus funds that create a slew of temporary projects which give the illusion that the jobs market is improving, but creating real jobs that last is something that is nearly impossible for the Government to create.

It is often said that unemployment lags the real economy. But, it is different this time. Yes, it really is different this time. How do we know it is different?

The chart below depicts how many weeks people are unemployed. At no time has the duration of unemployment been as high as it is now. The chart says it all…

Number of Weeks People are unemployed

The President will probably try to convince the people that his administration has already created or saved nearly 1 million or more jobs from the stimulus package last year. But if it is based on the calculations discussed in my previous post on the subject (President Changes Definition), then I would be worried about any promises of new jobs.

All through the late 70’s and the 80’s American’s were told how great it would be in a ‘new global economy’. And many others warned that America’s strength in manufacturing would suffer. And suffer it did, today the United States makes very little. Everything from steel processing, electronics, and even customer support for your American bank is in another nation.

For America, the ‘new global economy’ has been a bust. As consumers we want everything to be cheap, and in that demand for lower and lower priced products they are being manufactured in countries where their employees can be paid just a fraction of what it would cost to be made here in America. Some companies even resort to manufacturing products in third world countries where child labor is used and unsafe working conditions prevail. This is what we get when the Wal-Marts of the world take over and push family run business out, and push cheap products made in China and other countries on the consumer while paying their employees here next to nothing.

Cheap products are one thing, but what are we really sacrificing just so we can get that toy for $5.00 cheaper, or the cheap products (with some even being unsafe) from the million dollar stores across America?

As Americans, are we guilty of creating the demand for cheaper and cheaper products? Are we responsible for the decline of America’s once great dominance in the world as a manufacturer? Or has all of this been a result of a global economy that seized the United States consumer with the enticement of cheap products? All good questions and no easy answer. But I would like to see some large American corporations actually make their products here for a change.

Take Apple (AAPL) for example. Not one product they sell is made here in America that I am aware of. Because everything revolves around ‘more profits’ they have to keep finding ways to make the products cheaper so they employ cheap labor in other nations. We can’t force American companies to manufacturer their products here because they would just move the company to another nation. Perhaps the only way to restore America to a goods producing powerhouse is to boycott any company that does not make their products here at home. But even that would be nearly impossible, because not much is made here anymore so we have little choice.

American’s are held hostage by every company that sells us our televisions, sneakers, clothes, and even the toys for our children. 

Where does it end?

More on this topic (What's this?)
Quote of the Day — Obama’s Tragic Flaw
Read more on Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

Banks Are Worried Their Free Lunch Is Over

“Never Again Will the American Taxpayer be Held Hostage by a Bank that is ‘Too Big to Fail’"

Wow, my ears are still ringing from the sudden and shocking statement made by the President today. All of my readers know all to well that I am a strong advocate for bringing back the Glass-Steagall act.

The statements made by President Obama today, while falling short of actually reinstating Glass-Steagall, still has many merits that I strongly support. It is a good start.

Wall Street – Watch out, your free lunch may be coming to an end.

As I have written and voiced in my market videos over the past many months, the advances have been a bear market rally within a broader secular bear market. The rise in equity prices over the past six months has been, for the most part, a result of easy money at the expense of the tax payers. And a free lunch card is no way to create a healthy and organically robust economy. Today, President Obama has threatened to cancel the free lunch card for good.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

January 21, 2010

President Obama Calls for New Restrictions on Size and Scope of Financial Institutions to Rein in Excesses and Protect Taxpayers

The proposal would:

1.   Limit the Scope – The President and his economic team will work with Congress to ensure that no bank or financial institution that contains a bank will own, invest in or sponsor a hedge fund or a private equity fund, or proprietary trading operations unrelated to serving customers for its own profit.

2.   Limit the Size – The President also announced a new proposal to limit the consolidation of our financial sector.  The President’s proposal will place broader limits on the excessive growth of the market share of liabilities at the largest financial firms, to supplement existing caps on the market share of deposits.

In the coming weeks, the President will continue to work closely with Chairman Dodd and others to craft a strong, comprehensive financial reform bill that puts in place common sense rules of the road and robust safeguards for the benefit of consumers, closes loopholes, and ends the mentality of “Too Big to Fail.”   Chairman Barney Frank’s financial reform legislation, which passed the House in December, laid the groundwork for this policy by authorizing regulators to restrict or prohibit large firms from engaging in excessively risky activities.

As part of the previously announced reform program, the proposals announced today will help put an end to the risky practices that contributed significantly to the financial crisis.

I am truly impressed. Now the question is will it ever see the light of day? Almost immediately following Obama’s statements came a whole bunch of opposing opinions. Some view the measures, if made into law, would prevent the big Wall Street firms from being able to compete on an international level. My response to that is – tough shit.

Some have said that the new rules could hamper the banks from operating efficiently in the future. My response to that is – too bad, learn how to make money the old fashioned way, by earning it, not placing tax payer funds at risk.

And various congress critters are chiming in and they think it will destroy the banking system. My response – It has already been destroyed, now lets fix it.

The markets sold off significantly today as the idea of the free lunch card may be taken away. Some will criticize President Obama for crashing the stock market. Sorry, it is not his fault the market tanked today. The reason it sank is that it was being propped up on air in the first place. Reality sucks, doesn’t it. If the free lunch is cancelled then equities will be forced to price to reality, not goosed by the taxpayer being robbed every day.

Now we have to make this become a reality. Any senator or representative that opposes the new constraints on Wall Street will be showing his or her cards, and those cards will have been paid and supplied by Wall Street. In that case throw the bum out!

If any financial institution, who has been sucking on the taxpayer teat for the past two years does not like the proposed changes, then I have only one thing to say to them – Live with it, or fail. We won’t shed a tear if you go out of business.