Calls for Tim Geithner and Larry Summers to Resign

House minority leader John Boehner (R) today has called for Treasury Secretary Timmy Geithner and White House adviser Larry Summers to resign.

Boehner said President Obama’s team lacks “real-world, hands-on experience” in creating jobs that are needed for a full economic recovery. The Republican lawmaker cited reports that some senior aides complained of “exhaustion,” including the recently departed budget chief Peter Orszag.

“President Obama should ask for – and accept – the resignations of the remaining members of his economic team, starting with Secretary Geithner and Larry Summers, the head of the National Economic Council,” Boehner said in the morning speech to business leaders at the City Club of Cleveland. The mass dismissal, he added, would be “no substitute for a referendum on the president’s job-killing agenda. That question will be put before the American people in due time. But we do not have the luxury of waiting months for the president to pick scapegoats for his failing ‘stimulus’ policies.” {…} (Washington Post)

While I am quite sure John Boehner’s call for the Obama economic team to resign is along political party lines I have to join him in the call for Geithner and Summers to resign. This should come as no surprise to my long term readers for I have been solidly against Ben Bernanke and the Presidents economic team, especially Tim Geithner.

Ben Bernanke and his merry men at the FOMC have missed every clue leading up to the economic disaster while outsiders kept arguing (including me) that the economy was headed for the toilet.

When Mr. Tim Geithner was at the New York Fed, prior to becoming Treasury Secretary he was joined at the hip to Wall Street. It was his job to be ‘close’ to Wall Street. And as Treasury Secretary  Mr. Geithner continues his old ways with the ‘go easy on Wall Street’ approach as evidenced by the ridiculous financial reform (FINREG) bill that is now law of the land.

Larry Summers, the only good thing I have to say about Mr. Summers is, well, I’ll have to get back to you on that one because I can’t think of anything good right now.

The Obama administration did strike back today with a report from the Comical Congressional Budget Office that sates the stimulus added anywhere between 1.7 to 4.5 percent to real GDP. And that the stimulus increased the number of full time jobs by 2.0 to 4.8 million.

Ok, we have heard of the media claiming green shoots were everywhere last Spring. Now I know where all those green shoots went when they wilted, they are being smoked in Washington, D.C.

Lets say for a moment that the stimulus did add to the GDP by as much as 4.5%. What does that tell you about the ‘real economy’? Take away the stimulus and organic growth is still negative. A point I have opined about for a very long time here on my site. It is not what the stimulus does in the short term, it is the state of organic growth that matters. And with each passing day it is becoming more and more apparent just what the organic growth is really like. It’s not a pretty picture.

Impact of Stimulus




More on this topic (What's this?)
The Trouble with Tim’s Treasury
Five Observations from Successful Traders
Read more on Timothy Geithner, Tim, Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

S&P 500 (SPX) Bounces at 50% Fibonacci Level and Economists See Relapse of Recession

As discussed in the previous market video; the 1,070 level (50% Fibonacci) would provide a likely bounce point for the market. This is exactly what happened early today with the markets putting in an oversold bounce.

While the S&P 500 held above the 1070 level this should not be taken as an ‘all is well’ , on the contrary I view all market advances (retracement rallies) as opportunities to sell longs and/or establish new short positions at good risk/reward entry points.

S&P 500 Chart

In other news, 40% of economists who were smart enough to know the economy was going to enter a recession way before it did now think the nation will go into another recession or go deeper into the current one. (HufPo)

8 16 2010 3 06 30 PM S&P 500 (SPX) Bounces at 50% Fibonacci Level and Economists See Relapse of Recession

Economists who predicted the economy was (and still is) just fine have announced that their organization ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ was seeking another meeting location due to their office building having been foreclosed upon. The Eyes Wide Shut group hopes to secure their new meeting location before their guest speaker, Timmy Geithner, is scheduled to deliver their yearly pep rally later this year.




More on this topic (What's this?)
33 Dividend Champions to Consider
S&P 500 Signals Danger!
Read more on S&P 500 (SPX) at Wikinvest

Financial Reform – Another Shell Game Leaves Tax Payers on the Hook

The financial reform bill has a backdoor bailout clause that would have utilized $50 Billion of funds set aside to be used when another big bank needed a bailout or winding down. This backdoor bailout is a fact, even with some politicians, and the President, saying it was no such thing.

Well now it gets worse. Tonight senate leaders agreed to scrap the $50 Billion fund and instead use a system by which the FDIC would provide the necessary funding to handle the failed institution. The source of this new funding would be accomplished by setting up a new line of credit with the treasury department, and it would be backed by the failed company’s assets.

Ok, so let us walk through this one. The first idea in the bill was to set aside $50 Billion, which Geithner claimed would have been funded by the big institutions themselves. The reason it has been referred to as a backdoor taxpayer bailout is that the increased levies on the big banks would simply be passed along to the tax payer.

So then if in the future a Citigroup, or Bank of America for example needed another bailout or needed to be ring fenced if the firm goes into core meltdown then the funds would be drawn from the $50 Billion reserve.

Now, the newest idea is even worse than the first one. Under this agreement the $50 Billion is scrapped altogether. In its place will be a new credit line established between the treasury department taxpayer and the FDIC. So if a Citigroup for example goes into a meltdown then the firm would be wound down and costs to perform the bailout / wind down would be provided by the FDIC / Treasury credit line. And when the nuclear dust settles the assets of the firm will be sold to reimburse the Treasury.

[…] Aides to the committee chairman, Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, and the panel’s senior Republican, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, said the two senators had agreed to scuttle a $50 billion fund proposed by Democrats.

The fund, which was opposed by the Obama administration, drew criticism from Republicans who had warned that it would promote rather than prevent taxpayer bailouts of failed financial companies.

Under the deal, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would finance the liquidation of failed financial companies, using a new credit line with the Treasury Department backed by the failed company’s assets. The money would be recouped later through the sale of assets, with shareholders and creditors forced to take losses.[…] emphasis added (NYT)

The problem with this ridiculous plan is that the taxpayers only get reimbursed if the assets of the failed firm are enough to cover the original outlay of funds that were needed to wind them down. It puts the taxpayers on the hook yet again for Wall Street screw ups. Only this time it is disguised even better with the FDIC being front and center, and behind the FDIC is the treasury and taxpayers.

I don’t see things as optimistically as the NYT does. Take for example the bank failures of the past 18 months. When the FDIC moves in a seizes the bank they establish an estimate of what the costs will be to the insurance fund. In later months, the FDIC issues additional reports on the failed bank, and in many instances the true cost ends up being much higher than first estimated when it is discovered that the assets the institution was holding was worth much less than what was being reported. We have mark to myth accounting rules to thank for that.

So if the treasury taxpayer is going to be reimbursed by the assets held from the failed institution then I say this is just one more shell game being played on the American people.

General Motors Loan Repayment was a Shell Game

Just two weeks ago General Motors (GM) announced that they had reimbursed the government (taxpayers) by paying back the balance of the TARP $6.7 Billion loan. General Motors even went on the air with the following television commercial:

But is General Motors being completely honest? Not according to Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa and Neil Barofsky, inspector general for the TARP. Essentially all that General Motors did was to use ‘other’ taxpayer funds held by the Treasury to pay off its original loan. This makes the claims that General Motors has repaid their debt to the American tax payers a tricky shell game.

In a letter sent to Secretary Tim Geithner on April 22, 2010 Senator Grassley had this to say:

Dear Secretary Geithner:

General Motors (GM) yesterday announced that it repaid its TARP loans. I am
concerned, however, that this announcement is not what it seems. In fact, it appears to be nothing more than an elaborate TARP money shuffle.

On Tuesday of this week, Mr. Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for
TARP, testified before the Senate Finance Committee. During his testimony Mr.
Barofsky addressed GM’s recent debt repayment activity, and stated that the funds GM is using to repay its TARP debt are not coming from GM earnings. Instead, GM seems to be using TARP funds from an escrow account at Treasury to make the debt repayments.

The most recent quarterly report from the Office of the Special Inspector General for TARP says “The source of funds for these quarterly [debt] payments will be other TARP funds currently held in an escrow account.” See, Office of the Special Inspector General for TARP, Quarterly Report to Congress dated April 20, 2010, page 115.

Furthermore, Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 8K filed by GM with the SEC on
November 16, 2009, seems to confirm that the source of funds for GM’s debt repayments was a multi-billion dollar escrow account at Treasury—not from earnings […]

[…] Therefore, it is unclear how GM and the Administration could have accurately announced yesterday that GM repaid its TARP loans in any meaningful way. In reality, it looks like GM merely used one source of TARP funds to repay another. The taxpayers are still on the hook, and whether TARP funds are ultimately recovered depends entirely on the government’s ability to sell GM stock in the future. Treasury has merely exchanged a legal right to repayment for an uncertain hope of sharing in the future growth of GM. A debt-for-equity swap is not a repayment.[…] (Senate documents)

Furthermore, the Congressional Budget Office maintains their estimates that the American taxpayers in the end will lose approximately $30 Billion of the total General Motors bailout funds.

So did General Motors pay back the taxpayers? No, they just moved funds from one accountshell-game to another. General Motors, and the U.S. Treasury Department, have simply pulled a fast one on the American taxpayer with what appears to be nothing more than an old fashioned shell game.

Lehman’s Demise Was Assisted Suicide

Editorial by RebelTraders:

The demise of Lehman Brothers (LEH), which filed for bankruptcy on September 15, 2008, was suicide. And that suicide was for all intents and purposes assisted by the government and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, then headed by one Tim Geithner.clue Lehman’s Demise Was Assisted Suicide

This week the examiner’s report on Lehman Brothers bankruptcy proceedings was released to the public and it reads like a murder mystery, not all that dissimilar to the board game ‘Clue’.

From my own interpretations of the report thus far, Lehman’s troubles began long before their collapse on September 15 2008. The troubles, heightened by the collapse of the mortgage market and then amplified by a never ending shell game at the hands of upper management, financial officers, and even the independent auditors. Many now claim they had no knowledge of the tricks being played with the books, but, it was their job to know where the money was, and why it was there or not.

Ernst & Young were the independent auditors for Lehman Brothers, they were supposed to be the final check and balance that everything on the books was honest and fairly represented. In that they signed off on the financial statements implicates them by default in my opinion. This reminds me of Arthur Anderson, then auditors for Enron all over again.

What Lehman was doing was hiding bad assets, what otherwise would have impacted their quarterly balance sheets in a negative way by moving them around in a complex shell game called “Repo 105” and Repo 108”. These were essentially conduits to move bad assets off the books, and in turn receive cash for those bad assets. This made the bad stuff disappear for a while so to speak, and the quarterly reports reflected the cash on hand and not the bad assets. Even worse is that Lehman never reported that these were repo operations, instead they recorded these transactions as sales. This alone is fraud, and it should have been known by upper management, including the independent auditors.

Now comes the assisted suicide part. Lehman Brothers was truly sick. As far back as March 2008 the Federal Reserve Bank New York (FRBNY), at the time when Tim Geithner was at the helm, began monitoring Lehman Brothers. The FRBNY devised stress tests for Lehman to gauge the health of the company under adverse conditions.

From page 1488 of the report:

After March 2008 when the SEC and FRBNY began onsite daily monitoring of Lehman, the SEC deferred to the FRBNY to devise more rigorous stress?testing scenarios to test Lehman’s ability to withstand a run or potential run on the bank.5753 The FRBNY developed two new stress scenarios: “Bear Stearns” and “Bear Stearns Light.”5754 Lehman failed both tests.5755 The FRBNY then developed a new set of assumptions for an additional round of stress tests, which Lehman also failed.5756 However, Lehman ran stress tests of its own, modeled on similar assumptions, and passed.5757 It does not appear that any agency required any action of Lehman in response to the results of the stress testing.

In other words, The Federal Reserve Bank of New York devised three separate stress tests and Lehman failed every one of them. Then, Lehman devised its own stress test and they passed. Lehman then submitted the findings of their own stress test to the FRBNY and the issue was put to rest. No one knew at the time that Lehman had failed the FRBNY stress tests except for Lehman and The Reserve bank of New York.

Is this another case where Tim Geithner will say that he had no direct knowledge of the stress testing being done, like he has claimed with certain AIG emails and transactions concerning material information be withheld from the Securities and Exchange Commission?

Why is it that the biggest decisions always happen to take place under the noses of those in charge. To me it seems to be selective memory.

It is my opinion that the problems at Lehman Brothers was known for many months and the FRBNY knew this but kept it secret. In my view the actions of the regulators, the SEC, and that of the New York Reserve Bank was a coordinated effort to hide the problems taking place from the public, this too is fraud. The act of keeping quiet and not disclosing what was known from the stress tests was, in my opinion, the same thing as the FRBNY acting as Dr. Kevorkian. However in this case the death was not painless and the pain was felt by individual investors.

Lehman, under the daily supervision of the FRBNY, played with the books by constantly moving the bad money out of view, falsely creating a better picture of the liquidity situation within the company. It is my opinion that all of this was conducted in a way to protect the knowledge of how Wall Street operates. The 2,200 page report reads like a murder victims coroner report. In it, is enough information that should have upper management at other large firms scurrying like cockroaches in the night when the lights are turned on. The games that were being played at Lehman were, and are, probably being played at other firms to this day in varying degrees, this I have no doubt.

The collapse of Enron was supposed to serve as a wake up call, and actions taken then were to prevent this kind of stuff from ever happening again. But with any regulation comes new ways to hide things.

What is even worse, what is so scary, and what should have everyone unable to sleep comfortably is that the current financial reform bill being proposed by the Senate has absolutely nothing in it of any substance that will change the normal way of Wall Street business. The tax payers will always be on the hook in the event of another big failure or bailout. The financial reform being proposed is nothing more than an illusion that the Government is on top of things and will prevent it from happening again.

In reality, the government is simply coddling Wall Street as they always have, this time under the illusion that the Government is interested in ‘our’ best interests by presenting a financial reform bill that has no teeth, but sounds good on the surface because it uses the publicly identifiable buzz words like “too big to fail”. Really it is nothing but worthless paper in this authors view.

As usual Dylan Ratigan always has a way of explaning things.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

More on this topic (What's this?)
Lehman Brothers, the next Enron?
Read more on Lehman Brothers at Wikinvest

Marc Faber – The United States is Junk

Marc Faber has blunt words for Tim Geithner and the United States. If the nation was a corporation, the credit rating would be junk.

Stock Market – Weekend Wrap for January 31 2010

The weekend wrap up video is now available for viewing on the ‘market update videos’ page.

Monday Schedule:

08:30 Dec Personal Income (last 0.4%), Dec Personal Spending (last 0.5%), Dec PCE Deflator y/y (last 1.5%), Dec PCE Core (last m/m 0.0%, y/y 1.4%)

10:00 Dec ISM Manufacturing (last 55.9), Dec ISM Prices Paid (last 61.5), Dec Construction Spending m/m (last -0.6%)

10:00 Treasury Sec Geithner to testify before Senate Finance Committee

15:00 Treasury quarterly funding estimates

Earnings

Before the Open: AMG, ACV, CRNT, CYOU, DEP, EPD, XOM, GCI, HAE, HEW, HUM, MDU, MOG/A, NI, ONB, SOHU, SYY

After the Close: ADVS, APC, CCK, DST, EXTR, HOLX, ICUI, LOCM, MNKD, NOA, OCLR, PMT, PCL, RGA, RCII, RTEC, SIMO, TUP, UNCA

Tim Geithner – Written Testimony For AIG Hearing Is Released

Ahead of tomorrows big show on the Hill, Tim Geithner’s written testimony has been leaked. I do not know if this was intentionally leaked or not. Nor do I know how it came to be on the net ahead of the embargo period, but it is swilling around the net now.

Tim Geithner Written Testimony